A desi immigrant rights activist is one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit challenging pseudorandom bag searches on the NYC subway.
The trial began yesterday:
Partha Banerjee… fears he will be wrongly targeted, regardless of an NYPD policy prohibiting racial profiling. “I came from India 20 years ago, yet immigrants like me are seen as an enemy,” he said. [Link]Christopher Dunn, the civil liberties union’s top lawyer in the case, said, “The only people being searched under this program are innocent New Yorkers.” The searches have not uncovered any terrorist plot, or even contraband… A third plaintiff, Partha Banerjee, said he had felt humiliated when his bag was searched at a political rally several years ago. [Link]
Mr. Banerjee was searched under the subway search policy on October 7, 2005… Mr. Banerjee objects to the subway search policy because under it, the decision to search someone is not founded on criminal suspicion. In addition, he fears that police officers could unlawfully interrogate and detain him because of written [political] materials in his bag that they might find objectionable and is concerned that he may be targeted to be searched because of his dark eyes and skin and his beard. [Link]
The government’s argument:
Gail Donoghue, the city’s lead lawyer in the case, said the searches were part of a rational strategy calculated to “keep terrorist planning and operations off balance.” By adding an element of unpredictability, she said, the policy “effectively hardens New York City targets and drives terrorist planning elsewhere.” [Link]




set to expire, Mayor Bloomberg vetoed it. From one of the organizer’s emails: Because the mayor vetoed the bill so late, 






