In the U.S. we have been talking for a while now about a Diwali stamp. In the U.K. however, it is a Christmas stamp that has gotten the attention of the Hindu community. The Telegraph reports:
Hindus are demanding that Royal Mail withdraws one of this year’s Christmas stamps, claiming the mother and child image it represents is insulting to their religion.The 68p Christmas stamp, which would be used to send mail to India, features a man and woman with Hindu markings worshipping the infant Christ.
The image is one of a series of six mother and child stamps that go on sale today.Ramesh Kallidai, secretary general of the Hindu Forum of Britain, said the image was insensitive, because it showed people who were clearly Hindu worshipping Christ.
“It is the equivalent of having a vicar in a dog collar bowing down to Lord Ram on a Diwali stamp,” he said. “These things need to be done with sensitivity.”
The main feature in this stamp that is causing anger is the fact that the man in the painting has a “tilak” on his forehead, which identifies him as a Vaishnava Hindu, and the woman has a “kumkum” mark on her forehead, identifying her as a married Hindu woman.
“It is striking to see that Royal Mail thinks it prudent to issue Christmas stamps that can cause resentment in the worldwide Hindu community but remains silent on the issuing of stamps for Diwali, the festival of lights celebrated by the third largest faith community in the UK and by a billion Hindus worldwide.”
I usually roll my eyes at things like this but I can’t help but admit that the above point is a valid one. The argument in defense of the stamp is that it is art from the 17th century. Why revise/reject it just to be politically correct?
The picture was chosen for Royal Mail by this year’s stamp designer, Irene Von Treskow, an Anglican priest in an English-speaking church in Berlin.She said she was fascinated by the image because it was so interesting to see a Mughal painting with a Christian subject.
She does not believe the picture is offensive. “How can it be?” she asked. “It is 17th-century art.”
Pickled Politics has more.