“Don” – Paan + Tae Kwon = Long

Don_27.jpg
Actually, the new Shah Rukh Khan movie Don isn’t as bad as you might expect, given all the negative reviews (for instance). It’s also shaping up to be a box office success.

Farhan Akhtar is probably the most hyped director in the new wave of Bollywood film directors. Though he comes from an old B-wood family (his father Javed co-wrote the script of the original Don), Farhan’s first film, Dil Chahta Hai showed no signs of film dynasty nepotism. Dil Chahta Hai was considered a stylistic breakthrough because of the realistic (well, relatively) plot and its rebellious attitude, and it became an anthem of sorts for the post-liberalization generation. That sense of clarity or mission is missing here: in his remake of Don, Farhan devotes most of his writer-director energy into matching western action flicks, fight-for-fight, and stunt for stunt. On this he succeeds: I liked the first car chase, and I think the skydiving fight scene is probably a first for Bollywood. There is also a certain amount of Kill Bill theatrical viciousness here that’s novel in the Bollywood hero-villain iconography.

What most of the film’s critics have missed, I think, is the basic problem of identity this film symbolizes, a problem which is broader than just this film. Farhan Akhtar seems to be torn between two approaches: on the one hand, he could do a slightly tweaked version of an outdated version of India, from a “disco” gangster movie that wasn’t all that great to begin with. (Yes, I said it.) The upside is you get the warm-and-fuzzy nostalgia atmosphere, but the danger is the mindless perpetuation of the myth of the “glory days” of Bollywood and Amitabh Bachchan, as if we need any more of that. Or: he could make a slick, essentially imported style of action movie, with a few “traditional” songs added to appeal to the folks in UP (the “Mourya Re” and “Khaike Paan Banaraswala” numbers). This film flirts with both but doesn’t fully commit, which shows it fundamentally doesn’t know what it wants to be.

It may be a false choice, but the question continues to nag: will the real, contemporary Indian film aesthetic please stand up? Incidentally, Priyanka Chopra is good here — it’s really the first film where I’ve liked her. For one thing she gets to actually do some serious martial arts fighting, which is usually off-limits for Bollywood actresses. I also liked Boman Irani, as the cop who is after Don, and Arjun Rampal, who has a grudge against the Boman Irani character.

The remixes of old songs are so-so, and most of the new music is pretty bad (the exception being the Ganapati song, “Maurya Re,” and the track by the Midival Punditz). In terms of how the songs are filmed, I have to say I slightly prefer the current style of cheesecake exploitation (Kareena Kapoor) to the old version (Zeenat Aman Helen) — though both are pretty much ridiculous.

But the music for this remake was going to be impossible. How could anyone top the original disco-funk opening to Don 1978? (Maybe if you brought in The Neptunes or Dr. Dre you could top that, but otherwise I don’t see how it could be done.)

More Youtube bits: Khaike Paan Banaras (new) vs. the original Khaike (Amitabh Bachchan wins this song, hands down)

Amitabh’s entry in the original Don

A fight sequence from the original Don

59 thoughts on ““Don” – Paan + Tae Kwon = Long

  1. Amitabh Veer ji, I’m a bit too busy these days in a new assignment I have taken up to look after my blog. Besides I do not have the single-minded devotion and perseverence of Amardeep. I wonder how he manages so much! Now with Puran Singh around, we shall have to wait and watch!

  2. Paanini’s work is awesome. As for the person we have no idea if it was even his/her name.

  3. on the one hand, he could do a slightly tweaked version of an outdated version of India, from a “disco” gangster movie that wasn’t all that great to begin with. (Yes, I said it.)

    When did you see the original Don?

    If you saw it relatively recently then Don ko samajhna mushkil nahin, namumkin hai.

  4. you probably realize that the last commentator has a name which is abusive and demeaning to the dignity of women.

  5. Amitabh ji, despite my relative inexperience, I remain somewhat conservative when it comes to “sense of humour”. Anyone trifling with the female genitalia as a blog id, I am afraid, is certainly not my idea of humour. I may be chronically melancholic but I know the above brand of “humour” is not the cure I am looking for.

  6. you probably realize that the last commentator has a name which is abusive and demeaning to the dignity of women.

    Lighten up, no one means it in the literal way when they use it. Aap kin mailon ke saath uthte baithte the? Anyway, I changed my name. Happy?

  7. attention:, if you have a script of Don the chase begin movie ?(in original language), please tell me … i need it for my research in linguistic . thanx advanced