I wish I were a man. Really. Their problems seem so much more…significant, no?
At least, that’s how I feel after reading a Washington Post article entitled, New Wives Bring New Hope to Sri Lankan Widowers.
Thanggod! Some good news about Sri Lanka, I thought, as I clicked the link and started reading:
Plunged into despair after the tsunami killed his wife and two of his four children, Ruknadhan Nahamani passed the first months after the disaster in an alcoholic fog, drowning his sorrows in the potent local liquor known as arrack . But grief was only part of the problem, he said.
“There was nobody to wash my clothes and take care of my kids when I went out to work,” said the wiry 32-year-old fisherman, whose teeth are stained red from chewing betel nut, a mild stimulant. “It was really difficult.”
But Nahamani is a single parent no more. In June, he exchanged wedding vows and jasmine garlands at a Hindu temple with a woman from a nearby village. “We are very happy,” he said outside his tent at a refugee camp as his new wife, Leelawathi, heated cooking oil for the evening meal.[link]
The man survived a tsunami and lost almost his entire family and lives in a refugee camp. Of course he deserves all the happiness he can find.
But the grinchy pebble I call a heart couldn’t muster more joy when I remembered all the war widows in Sri Lanka. Some 40,000 at last count.
And the fact that women drowned in massively disproportionate numbers (three times more) during the tsunami because they’re not taught to swim.
And the fact that widows are still treated like amoral harlots in most of South Asia.
Where’s the bloody community support for them? Continue reading

Until 
As I’ve watched the news over the past week I’ve started to consider if I should purchase a gun. I hate guns. I’ve only held one once. I have had one too many dreams where I was not only shot, but mutilated by gunfire. I’ve convinced myself that I must have died from a GSW in my past life and so I’ve wanted nothing to do with them. Indian families don’t really own guns. Am I wrong? Maybe I am just sheltered but I just don’t know any Indian families that own guns. Most of my first generation relatives have never even mentioned gun ownership. In India my family didn’t own a gun…well except for an air gun which they used to shoot geckos off the wall. I could imagine that South Asian hoteliers, convenience store owners, and wannabe thugs are probably packing, but outside of that I’d be surprised. How many South Asians do you know that either hunt or are members of the NRA? Not many I’ll bet. Recently I tried to talk my younger brother into buying a weapon. In the state in which he resides you aren’t a man without a piece. People wear them in plain sight on their waist he tells me. Two weeks ago a man in a pick-up truck pulled up beside him as he walked along the road and asked if he was packing. “No,” my brother replied. “You should be,” advised the man. It isn’t only bears and wolves but some crazies (everyone tells him so) where my brother lives that makes a gun a good idea.

The NYT’s spin feels to me like the wealthy patting the pre-industrial on the head. It’s a yearning you only get after industrializing: