He is tall, slim, and strikingly long limbed. Dressed in jewel-colored silk tunics and antique ornaments that are family heirlooms, he looks more like a handsome young maharaja than a traditional South Indian dancer. Newsweek
Yes, I know, vomit, it sounds like more exoticizing pablum from a mainstream media source. But getting past the opening drivel, this article (posted in the news tab, thanks Brij01!) turned out to be about a rather fascinating family:
Aniruddha Knight is the ninth generation heir of a 200-year-old family of professional dancers and musicians from Chennai, India. He is also half American. His father, Douglas Knight, married into this artistically rich family when he studied classical drumming on a South Indian mridangam at Wesleyan University, where Aniruddha’s late grandmother–T. Balasaraswati, India’s prima danseuse–and her two musician brothers had taught since 1962.
Aniruddha followed his mother and grandmother, continuing the family’s bharatanatyam tradition:
Knight is fluent in Tamil, his mother’s language, and spends half a year in India, performing and learning from aunts and cousins who had worked with his mother. He has established a school and an archive of family history in Chennai. (The Smithsonian boasts an archive of Bala’s performances, too.) It houses all the records of his grandmother’s performances.
About his mixed parentage:
“It’s isolating to identify with two cultures, it creates a split personality. I can never be just one or the other, it’s a heartwrenching lonely process. But then, what I have, many don’t have.”
Those against mixed marriages often cite fear of waning traditions, culture, language, etc., as a reason to date within one’s own ethnic community. So it’s heartwarming to see this family’s artistic legacy continuing on, and even thriving, under the stewardship of its youngest, half-desi member. But do other half-desis feel the same sense of loneliness and isolation? Most that I’ve known feel as though they have a deeper connection to both, not an alienation from either, but it’s clearly a personal path. I’m curious to hear any stories readers might have to share on this topic.
Also, I watched a bit of his performance here, and I’m not sure what to make of it. I’m a rank ignoramus about bharatanatyam, so perhaps I’m just used to the more typical form:
However, the version that Knight dances is stylistically unique. It originated as a temple offering performed by young women who were dedicated to serving God by retelling ancient Hindu myths through music and dance in the temple courtyard.
He sings while dancing as well, which threw me off a bit. But, again, this could be entirely due to my own lack of knowledge. His hand movements are beautiful though…I encourage anyone with a bharatanatyan background to please take a look and share your thoughts.
May I join? 🙂 What a lengthy desi discussion! 🙂 Forgot the original posting?
Let me tell you, I watched Ani’s Chennai’s performance in Chennai in winter. It was well-announced. I watched it for 15 minutes, with my 3 friends (dancers), we had a good laugh (they don’t have a regular circus in Chennai, you know), and when we were leaving, about 15 people were left (Nandini Ramani and the entourage). I feel pity towards those who have a social obligation to watch junk performances. It is the social obligation, not genuine interest, that drives crowds for the lame arangetrams.
About Ani: don’t tell me anybody used to dance so clumsily and with such horrible expressions in such a costume 200 years ago. Or 500 years ago? The remnants of tradition was lost with the death of Balasaraswathy, who was vigorously trying to defend the Sringara, and fought with Rukmini Devi who successfully replaced Sringara with Bhakti. In order to popularize it, that is. Now we have Bharatanatyam – a popular South Indian folk dance. Enjoy, and forget that 300 years ago all the temple devadasis used to perform the 108 karanas. Be a true desi. Eat pop-corn, don’t read the Natya Shastra.
Enough of the intro. 🙂 Let me address some of your interesting writings.
I wish more desi or Chennai parents thought so too! Unfortunately…
You think it is much better in Chennai? Come and see.
What a masterful and colorful description!!!!!! 🙂
Bharatanatyam started out as a form of temple worship? No. Read the Natya Shastra, educate yourself. At present, there is hardly anything left in Bharatanatyam of what was there 2000 years ago.
Well said!
Well, “revival” of… what??? Rukmini Devi, for those stupid foreigners, I guess, developed a simplified form of Tamil folk dance and called it… Bharatanatyam. Wasn’t it her Italian tailor who designed the contemporary (“traditional”) costume? 🙂
Art – like spirituality – in Kali Yuga lost its primary importance. People do not ask the temple brahmins if they understand the useless mantras they mumble.
Yeahhhh… But even in Chennai the number of “professional rasikas”, critics or professional dancers who attend Bharatanatyam performances is dwindling.
No, no, no! 🙂 Did the dancer have a waisteline? 🙂 Your mind is not fooled: it is boring. These “traditional styles” are hardly older than 150 years! Please don’t make me laugh. Look in Silapadikaram – what kind of dances did they performed then? What is left of THAT tradition? Nothing. Zero.
It lost its attractiveness and entertaining nature because it lost most of its elements. Shringara was replaced by Bhakti. How many karanas can the dancers perform today?
In Natya Shastra, they describe that the rasikas (or rivals) used to throw cow dung and other things at (bad) dancers. Someone here wanted to seem very traditional. We need to revive the tradition. Yes?
Dance competitions are like tournaments.
What a well-balanced suggestion! I wish more gurus adopt this approach!
It is rajasic (American) pride that pushes them to compete, compete, compete with the Patels! 🙂 Clowns!
Most people think martial arts are just boxing. Many people think Bharatanatyam is just dancing. Bharatanatyam, it seems, will follow the destiny of Kung-Fu: while most people practise it half-heartedly, thinking “What if it helps me in a street fight one day?”, few take it as a sadhana and explore its spiritual dimensions. “I studied Kung-Fu in my younger years, told me a 40-year-old Chinese businessman. My teacher’s teacher lives on a mountain hill and can even levitate. I stopped my Kung-Fu studies and went abroad to study business”. Within 5 months of saying this, this Chinese businessman was knifed to death by his Chinese “business partners” who refused to return $100000 worth of leather jackets. The Chinese businessman is dead. He did not know life can be short. If he knew it, would be have made the same choices?
Quality was sacrificed for quantity. Bharatnatyam is in trouble, like spirituality in Kali Yuga.
What was called what?
No, here you show your materialistic viewpoint. From a spiritual point of view, for example, the influence of Ganesha is limited (approximately) to the physical boundaries of India. Now, the smaller, semi-gods, apsaras, also have limited areas of influence. However, you are right in one thing: we don’t know how deeply a particular dancer will be influenced by a particular emanation.
It is possible as a short-term (1000-2000 years) effect, but, there will always be new incarnations of those who will restore it. Don’t worry: it is none of our business. Natya, unlike ballet, is not of human origin.
“Participation”? Number of rasikas? Yes, the drop in quality resulted in the drop of interest, especially among the younger generation here. Besides, Chennai has grown, and, with all the traffic jams the rasikas prefer to watch it on TV, DVD and…. YouTube! 🙂
Diaspora has a great role.
I’ve created a great profile of a kathak student from Queens, NY. A student of 10 years, I’ve captured kathak place in her New York life.
Check it out here: http://blogs.journalism.cuny.edu/interactive2010/2009/12/07/kathak-in-the-city/
Aash