“Tell them that it can happen to anybody”

A writer to the tip line draws our attention to a terrible death in Indiana: “Nupur Srivastava was a distant relative’s daughter and my mother knew her well. Everyone is distraught over her passing, especially given the circumstances.” Srivastava died last week after being in an induced coma since April 3 with third degree burns over 80 percent of her body. She was allegedly doused with gasoline and set on fire by her boyfriend, Michael Wilson, who is now charged with murder. Both Srivastava and Wilson were 33.

Srivastava’s family has an important message:

[Srivastava] was rebuilding her life, setting herself on a road to recovery from alcohol abuse and toward a career in public relations or event management, [her sister Ritu] Adams said. Others saw Srivastava, petite at less than 95 pounds, as “drop-dead gorgeous,” but her sister’s low self-esteem prevented her from seeing herself as beautiful, Adams said.

She suspects that contributed to her sister staying in an abusive relationship. Police investigators are piecing those details together, Adams said. The family simply wants Nupur’s story to resonate with others.

“Tell them that it can happen to anybody,” Veena Srivastava pleaded.

“She was doing so good,” Adams said of her sister’s fresh start. “Maybe she was afraid to leave him. There are a lot of women who probably won’t speak out because they’re ashamed of their past, but that shouldn’t matter.

“People say, ‘It can’t happen to me.’ Guess what? It happened to my sister.”

Update: That link either moved or is now broken. For more information, please try here.

71 thoughts on ““Tell them that it can happen to anybody”

  1. Its sad that it takes an incident like this to underscore the message:

    Domestic violence is not constrained to any particular community, class , race or country.Its international and endemic.

    We have recently had so many controversial discussions even here at SM about DV being more prevalent in the South Asian community etc.Then something like this happens that turns one’s worldview upside down.Nupur was South Asian , her boyfriend ( at least from his name) does not appear to be South Asian .It really can happen to anyone.

  2. We have recently had so many controversial discussions even here at SM about DV being more prevalent in the South Asian community etc.Then something like this happens that turns one’s worldview upside down.Nupur was South Asian , her boyfriend ( at least from his name) does not appear to be South Asian .It really can happen to anyone.

    It should not be a surprise that DV exists outside of the desi community as well. Gurinder Chadha films notwithstanding, it’s a mistake to think that brown boys beat and white boys do not. There may be a difference in prevalence, but that’s one of degree not type.

  3. This is so sad. She is my age. I was feeling old this weekend, but now reading about the horrible way this woman’s life was cut sort, I feel young again, am reminded how much more time there is for living.

    For me there are parts of the story that strikes me as very interesting. It seems the victim’s boyfriend was American (judging from the name); but the dousing of the victim with gasoline – that sounds of course what is a prevalent form of abuse of women in South Asia.

    Did the American boyfriend (if he is) read about this sort of abuse in India and in his twisted mind decide to perpetuate it on his Indian-American girlfriend? That’s really horrible. I understand burning his girlfriend may have had nothing to do with anything he might have read about happens in South Asia, but since it is prevalent in South Asia, I am left to wonder if reading about incidents like this in South Asia, influenced his method of murder.

  4. He was white. If I find the mugshot, I’ll post it. What a horrific way to suffer, and what timing…he killed her the day she tried to leave.

  5. We have recently had so many controversial discussions even here at SM about DV being more prevalent in the South Asian community etc.

    Having been involved in an API DV organization for several years now (the organization tries to raise awareness about DV in the API community and offers culturally and linguistically sensitive methods of assistance if a survivor desires it)one thing we cannot conclude is that DV is more prevalent in the API community.

    Sometimes people assume that because we have a DV organization that specifically hopes to assist the API American community, that DV is more prevalent in our culture. There’s no statistics to that —– the need for API American DV organizations stems from the need to meet cultural and linguistic needs.

  6. 3 PS,

    Did the American boyfriend (if he is) read about this sort of abuse in India and in his twisted mind decide to perpetuate it on his Indian-American girlfriend?

    Agni maybe Indian, but fire is universal. Burning is NOT some special Indian method of killing. Would it have been better if he had killed her by dragging her with a harvestor or a tractor with a plough as many ‘accidents’ for insurance claims have happened in Texas and elsewhere?

  7. Agni,

    No, any form of abuse is horrible – I’m not sure why you asked that question, even if it was supposed to be rhetorical.

    Burning is NOT some special Indian method of killing.

    Of course burning a woman doesn’t only occur in South Asia…but there is no denying that it is a prevalent form of abuse in that culture. In order to understand what would be the best intervention methods for survivors of abuse, it’s important to understand the prevalence of certain types of abuse in a community. It would also be important I would think, from a legal standpoint in proving/disproving a crime.

  8. I am sorry to say that its a question of opportunity and access Burning has no great cultural significance . In the US access to guns is relatively easy ergo the large number of gun related crimes In India, lots of “accidents” happen beacuse of kitchen stoves , hence the large number of burning incidents

  9. As common as domestic violence is, in all races, it still shocks me reading something like this. Incredibly sad. Thoughts and prayers to her family.

  10. Mainstream statistic:

    • 70% of female homicides are by partners (spouses or boyfriends).

    • Most dangerous time for a woman in a violent relationship is when she attempts to leave.

    Sonya

  11. but there is no denying that it is a prevalent form of abuse in that culture

    Because

    There is huge prevalence of kerosene stoves and illumination lamps all over India. Still, kerosene is used as a primary domestic fuel in addition to coal, something that was quite common in 18th-early 19th century USA. Therefore, it is a handy instrument for violence.

    As Runa and others have said, in America, guns are prevalent, and they are………..

  12. Totally f*cked up. I wonder if it’s a first or second degree murder charge, from the looks of this guy, he probably couldn’t locate Indiana on a map, much less India. I doubt he had the capacity to choose “death by fire” as it would be some morbid twisted statement about her culture..

  13. Runa #9, and Khush Tandon #12 — you make a very important observation. I think people link Sati with all this, and as you say, overlook the fact that it is convenient not cultural. It is unfortunately a ghastlier and more painful way of meetings one’s end. It is also probably a very difficult and messy way to murder someone but easier to put an ‘accident’ spin on it. And as the header says, barbarian acts sound alien until it happens to someone you know. Or is perpetrated by someone you know.

  14. Sandeep,

    Also, all most majority of violence in India is “kerosene” (arson) induced.

    Caste wars, religious violence and riots, revenge, self-immolation – the primary means is through kerosene and fire. Muslims burn down Hindus, Hindus burn down Muslims when there are riots.

    Yes, it is just so handy and affordable.

  15. Burning=weapon of choice in South Asia because it’s convenient, not because South Asians are obsessed with fire. Agreed. Still, it’s surprising that the WASP-looking guy in Indiana chooses to kill with fire. Would have been so much easier to kill with a CO leak.

    Maybe I’m wrong but he seems to be saying: “This is how one deals w/ Desi women”. Not only does he kill her, he impugns Desi culture. Acknowledging the message doesn’t mean you agree with it.

    What a horrible, horrible story.

  16. Also culture can encompass what is “handy and affordable” – culture encompasses economics.

  17. “Still, it’s surprising that the WASP-looking guy in Indiana chooses to kill with fire. Would have been so much easier to kill with a CO leak. “

    Again, this guy looks like he has just enough brain power to tie his shoe. It’s a shame this lady felt she had to be with him, even the older sister shares this sentiment:

    Adams was unclear about when and how her sister met Wilson, and she wasn’t aware of serious problems in the relationship. But she says looking back, there were signs — changes in her sister’s behavior, incidents friends witnessed —

    So if the guy is obviously F(#$29cked in the head, he’s not going to think to himself, “hmm. gee. how can I kill her and make a political statement at the same time?” Unless of course, the entire act was premeditated, which is why I was curious of the first vs. second degree murder charge.

  18. This tragedy reminds me of Yvette Cade, who was set on fire at her job by her estranged husband, who walked in with a water bottle full of gasoline, threw it on her and then lit a match. Both Cade and the man who nearly murdered her are black. Abuse and rage see no color.

    Cade used to have a smooth mocha complexion and a figure that made men on the beach do a double take. But that was eight months ago, before her husband stormed into her workplace, threw gasoline on her and set her on fire. He was convicted in April of trying to kill her.
    Today, her face is covered in pink patches, and her arms, chest and back have thick coats of bumpy, coarse skin. Her days are spent in physical therapy struggling to recover movement.
    Many disfigured victims don’t like to show themselves in public for years after they are burned, let alone go to a nail salon. But Cade wears her scars boldly. Last month, she sat on Oprah Winfrey’s couch and unflinchingly told her story. She appeared with Paula Zahn on CNN and was featured in the June 19 edition of People magazine…If you ask, she’ll talk about the incident. It was the chilling way he said “I love you” that sticks with her.
    On the morning of Oct. 10, 2005, her then-husband Roger Hargrave walked into the T-Mobile store in Clinton where she was working and lighted her into a fireball.
    “My flesh was dripping off me,” she remembers. Doctors figured she had a 50-50 chance to survive.
    Cade suffered third-degree burns, the most severe kind, on 60 percent of her body. Her right foot was broken in five places where Hargrave stomped on it.
    She spent 92 days undergoing more than a dozen surgeries on her face and body. Doctors methodically stripped away her burned skin to avoid infection. They temporarily covered her with skin from a cadaver, then grafted on skin from her shins and other an unburned areas. [WaPo]
  19. There is huge prevalence of kerosene stoves and illumination lamps all over India. Still, kerosene is used as a primary domestic fuel in addition to coal, something that was quite common in 18th-early 19th century USA. Therefore, it is a handy instrument for violence.

    And grounds for a coverup because there are so many real accidental burnings. My father told me a story once about being at a friend’s house when the stove exploded. The new bride was wearing chiffon, which was highly flamable, and herself caught on fire. Luckily they were able to extinguish it before any permanent harm was done, but the combination of those stoves and synthetic clothing is a dangerous one. It’s not just the availability of kerosene.

  20. …from the looks of this guy, he probably couldn’t locate Indiana on a map, much less India… …this guy looks like he has just enough brain power to tie his shoe…

    HMF, obviously, if the guy did what he’s accused of, he’s evil, but is there any need to go down this road….? Assumptions about relative “intelligence”… from a police mug shot??! For all you know, he has a PhD in physics, but either way, what does it matter?

  21. A PhD in physics? Who’s being naive, kay?

    It matters in so far as it relates to speculations on his “rationale” for using fire vs. a gun vs a crossbow, if you contend that question of “why did he use fire..?” is itself irrelevant, then I would more or less agree with you.

  22. A PhD in physics? Who’s being naive, kay?

    Nothing personal (i.e., this isn’t an attach on you), but is your comment for real? Do you think you can assume anything about anyone from a headshot, police mugshot no less?

    That’s about as bad as a whole lot of scary and offensive analogies I can think of… Sorry, but any way you slice it, it just is.

  23. Nothing personal (i.e., this isn’t an attach on you), but is your comment for real? Do you think you can assume anything about anyone from a headshot, police mugshot no less?

    It wasn’t just the mugshot, it was articles, coverage, other pictures, plus this incident occurred in Indiana, where, yes I do believe its a safe assumption to make that most caucasian Indiana residents don’t know squat about India, and Indian customes beyond the very superfical and cursory, which would surely not include the historical significance of immolation.

    Now yes of course everything you say may well be true, but given all those particulars, the probability of him actually choosing death by fire as some kind of acknowledgement of perceived “backwards” traditions in India, are increasingly small.

  24. Oh, I definitely agree that this incident probably had no connection whatsoever to wife-burning in India. That seems a bit far-fetched. My point was just that we don’t really know anything about this guy “from the looks of him”: you may very well be right and he could be barely Cro-Magnon. Then again, maybe he went to Bloomington… Heinous crimes definitely aren’t confined to rednecks.

  25. I was kinda curious about how the paths of these two people who seem to come from such different backgrounds crossed and led to this. (I’m basing this on what I’ve read in the media so far)

  26. My point was just that we don’t really know anything about this guy “from the looks of him”: you may very well be right and he could be barely Cro-Magnon. Then again, maybe he went to Bloomington… Heinous crimes definitely aren’t confined to rednecks.

    That phrase was used for brevity, going to IU and being Cro Magnon aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive.

  27. I noticed in the story that her sister name was Ritu Adams and but Nupur had the same last name as her parents. So I guess that her sister married a man with a last name of Adams. I don’t know of too many desi’s with the last name Adams.

  28. HMF wrote:

    It wasn’t just the mugshot, it was articles, coverage, other pictures, plus this incident occurred in Indiana, where, yes I do believe its a safe assumption to make that most caucasian Indiana residents don’t know squat about India, and Indian customes beyond the very superfical and cursory, which would surely not include the historical significance of immolation.

    Why you gotta bring Indiana into this. This guy was a monster–that about sums it up.

  29. This is just awful – heartfelt condolences to the victim and family, and thanks to Siddhartha for bringing this to light.

    I just have to chime in and say this is of course not at all culturally related. Further, the choice to burn someone to death in no way related to your intelligence or whatnot. DV is gruesome, and as ANNA mentioned, it sees no color. Some people are sick enough to enjoy the slow, painful, tortuous death that a burn victim faces. And if that person survives, they are disfigured for life — either way it is one of the most violent and grotesque ways to kill a person — it’s similar to acid burning that way… which, p.s., also happens in the U.S. and is used by non-browns as well.

  30. When I saw this story in the morning here, I thought it might turn into a total troll fest due to the background of the man in the background. I am glad to see it has not. Of course I had feeling that HMF would go off on a few rants but the race of the man, but other then that nobody else has.

    Like a few other people have said DV is a problem in all groups.

    As for HMF, is there any part of the United States that you do like. In the past you have attacked the south and now you going after the midwest.

  31. HMF, obviously, if the guy did what he’s accused of, he’s evil, but is there any need to go down this road….? Assumptions about relative “intelligence”… from a police mug shot??! For all you know, he has a PhD in physics, but either way, what does it matter?
    A PhD in physics? Who’s being naive, kay?

    Kusala, don’t ever take sides with anyone against the Family again. Ever.

  32. Manju, I believe the appropriate response should have been:

    PhDs in physics don’t kill people?

  33. Why you gotta bring Indiana into this. This guy was a monster–that about sums it up.

    Ugh. My bringing it up had nothing to do with the crime, it has to do with speculations about his motivation for using fire, as it may connect to some morbid fascination with bride burning, etc… Why must I explain this over and over again? I don’t know.

  34. a man is murdered by his wife. it’s the man’s fault. a woman is murdered by her boyfriend. it’s the man’s fault. nice. two posts one after the other.

    remember – it’s the man’s fault. always!

    because all women are princesses straight out of fairy tales. they are incapable of lying, never cheat, never deceive anyone. If Ahluwalia says he beat her and she did nothing in return, then it must be true. and of course women simply cannot hit anyone physically. I must have been dreaming when my wife hit me. I must be the bad guy. of course, it’s the man’s fault.

  35. There’s a lot of different angles to this story going on. But I just have to support one angle before I get back to my work —-

    International pressure had a lot to do with the US passing its immigration laws – many black activists appealed to the international community to see America’s hypocrisy in its Jim Crow domestic laws as compared with the International Human Rights.

    Some commentators seem to think that this takes away from American civil rights activists – why would this be the case?! Instead it shows that the activists, just like those of today, are smart enough to use the international stage to propel US laws to meet their potential. It is a very important strategy that works in an increasingly globalized world.

    World War II had a lot to do with American civil rights activists voice getting louder and more influential. As many American civil rights leaders pointed out to the world —- how/why can Americans fight and die for human rights in other countries, when they do respect human and civil rights for their own citizens.

    I’m reading John Hope Franklin’s biography – as an eminent historian, who was invited often overseas for talks and conferences, he used this international platform to speak about America’s problem with racism and he often states that this international platform could help in ending racism at home.

  36. Sorry as usual I wrote in a rush and made a mistake –

    Correction: International pressure had a lot to do with the US passing its immigration laws – I meant to say: International pressure had a lot to do with the US passing its civil rights laws.

  37. Okay another mistake –

    World War II had a lot to do with American civil rights activists voice getting louder and more influential. As many American civil rights leaders pointed out to the world —- how/why can Americans fight and die for human rights in other countries, when America does not respect human and civil rights for their own citizens.

  38. This is why I’m for capital punishment. The world is much better off without men like this. Death to all rapists and women beaters!

  39. Nice I must have been dreaming when my wife hit me. I must be the bad guy. of course, it’s the man’s fault.

    No one deserves to be hit or abused in any way…man or woman. If you are being abused (verbally, mentally, emotionally, or physically) you need to get help immediately. If you don’t wish to call a South Asian agency here in the US (list here: http://www.maitri.org/res_usa.html), you can also call the National DV line: 1-800-799-SAFE (7233).

    Abuse is no different for a man than a woman. In my 14 years at Maitri, I have worked with several men who were being emotionally and physically abused by their wives and the stories can be as grim as male on female violence.

    I urge to reach out and get help.

    Sonya

  40. When I saw this story in the morning here, I thought it might turn into a total troll fest due to the background of the man in the background. I am glad to see it has not.

    Phew!

  41. Abuse is no different for a man than a woman. In my 14 years at Maitri, I have worked with several men who were being emotionally and physically abused by their wives and the stories can be as grim as male on female violence.

    I bet some men who are being abused by women are too ashamed to seek help because of the image of their un-masculine if people find out.

  42. Red Snapper

    You are so right. So many men don’t initially reach out until the situation becomes quite unbearable. The same is true for a lot of desi women and also the gay and lesbian population. In this group, the feeling is that you are being disloyal to your same sex partner after the battles of being accepted by the families, friends, and community at large. This can be even more scarier if one or both of the gay/lesbian couple are not out.

    Power and control and abuse among partners follows pretty much the same pattern whether it is male on female violence, female on male violence, or same sex violence. I hear the same exact words/reasonings/fear/shame from the men I’ve worked with as from the women I’ve worked with.

    Sonya

  43. Power and control and abuse among partners follows pretty much the same pattern whether it is male on female violence, female on male violence, or same sex violence.

    Sonya, why then are DV laws made to specifically exclude men from protection and exclude women from cupability? In India, Section 498a of the IPC and the new “Protection of Women from DV Act 2005” are amazing in their injustice towards men. They are a disgrace. but it’s all justified unde the umbrella of “it’s always the man’s fault”.

    I’m a sane, intelligent guy and so managed to identify the abuse for what it was, and got out of the relationship 3 years ago, but have not been able to divorce her yet, thanks to international complications and the biased Indian laws that allow a woman to blackmail a man, no matter what her conduct was like.

  44. I knew Nupur and her family, and her cousin, Richesh, is extremely dear to me. Please sign the petition below if you wish to support her family and help ensure that justice is achieved in her case.

    http://www.petitiononline.com/nupurs

    And to “nice”: I completely agree with the fact that abused men are both overlooked and underserved. Having researched and written a piece in law school about the Indian DV bill when it was first introduced in Parliament over there, I can say that the original proposal itself had various loopholes and inadequately addressed even the concerns of Indian women, the majority of victims of DV. A start, yes, but there existed much ground that it failed to cover, and likely still does.

  45. thanks to international complications and the biased Indian laws that allow a woman to blackmail a man, no matter what her conduct was like

    What’s even more unfortunate is people like the ones youve mentioned screw it up for women who have legitamite grievances.