They tapped my cell and the phone in the basement

As most of you surely know, USA TODAY broke the story yesterday that the National Security Agency (NSA) has been sifting through all of our phone records in order to see if they can establish “patterns” of terrorist activity. This post serves as a follow-up to my post last December.

The National Security Agency has been secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, using data provided by AT&T, Verizon and BellSouth, people with direct knowledge of the arrangement told USA TODAY.

The NSA program reaches into homes and businesses across the nation by amassing information about the calls of ordinary Americans — most of whom aren’t suspected of any crime. This program does not involve the NSA listening to or recording conversations. But the spy agency is using the data to analyze calling patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity, sources said in separate interviews…

It’s the largest database ever assembled in the world,” said one person, who, like the others who agreed to talk about the NSA’s activities, declined to be identified by name or affiliation. The agency’s goal is “to create a database of every call ever made” within the nation’s borders, this person added. [Link]

The ACLU, which defends our civil liberties, was not happy:

Both the attorney general and the president have lied to the American people about the scope and nature of the NSA’s program,” said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union. “It’s clearly not focused on international calls and clearly not just focused on terrorists. . . . It’s like adding more hay on the haystack to find that one needle.” [Link]

<

p>Oh, and by the way, did you guys know:

One government lawyer who has participated in negotiations with telecommunications providers said the Bush administration has argued that a company can turn over its entire database of customer records — and even the stored content of calls and e-mails — because customers “have consented to that” when they establish accounts. The fine print of many telephone and Internet service contracts includes catchall provisions, the lawyer said, authorizing the company to disclose such records to protect public safety or national security, or in compliance with a lawful government request. [Link]

<

p>I for one defend President Bush’s data mining program wholeheartedly. A person who cares about and is entrusted to maintain the security and success of ANY institution the way George W. Bush obviously cares for the United States of America, is expected, nay…duty-bound I should say, to keep track of their “organization.” If you guys disagree with this view then you obviously don’t understand the fact that with great power comes great responsibility.

<

p>My tremendous sense of responsibility is the very reason that I have been data mining and tapping the telephone calls of my fellow-bloggers here in our North Dakota headquarters for the past two years. Let me tell you a bit of what I’ve learned from this patriotic tool.

1) I became suspicious of the fact that every day between 5:00 and 5:30 p.m. a cluster of calls originating from Manish’s cell phone in Mumbai reached various places in the U.S. Correlating the calls to subsequent emails I learned that he was bragging about stalking the Bollywood actresses that work out at his new gym (especially an actress with the initials B.B.).

2) Neha would place a call to Canada every night after our day-end conference. I thought she was leaking information to the Canadian blogosphere but it turned out that she was just calling her bf who thinks she is really in America to be on the MTV reality show The Real World: North Dakota. Don’t worry bf, she talks about you all the time despite the best efforts of some.

3) Every night at 1a.m. Anna would get a two-second call. This was REALLY super shady and I was quite suspicious of her. Then I realized that 1a.m. every night is when I crank call her to whisper “Kaavya sucks!” before hanging up.

4) Ennis’ pager was blowing up at all hours of the day. I thought he was surely into something he shouldn’t have been. I was wrong though. He is just swimming in women and doesn’t have time to make trouble.

5) The fact that former guest-blogger Cicatrix calls the bunker only when the bunker is empty except for me does not indicate the planning of a coup.

6) Vinod-at-large really does travel the globe because of work, as proven by his cell phone records. At first I thought he was using one of those relay devices to mask his whereabouts and that he might in fact be dating a liberal or something.

7) Sajit is not an alcoholic. Every day for two months he would call an alcohol treatment center. I suspected the worst and was getting ready to force him out of SM. It turns out that he was placing the calls on behalf of his assistant.

8) Fofatlal has racked up a huge telephone bill by contacting the Psychic Friends Network.

9) Former guest-blogger Taz is trying to foment rebellion in Ecuador.

10) I don’t ever get any calls after 2:30a.m. (calls after 2:30a.m. are officially designated as booty calls). That’s not suspicious. I was just putting it out there.

In short, as you can see, my monitoring has been both justified and necessary. I have proved that despite having some quirks all of the bloggers have been loyal to SM. If I didn’t monitor their calls or mine them for patterns then I wouldn’t have been able to prove their virtue. You might argue that I’ve just been looking out for their best interests.

53 thoughts on “They tapped my cell and the phone in the basement

  1. CC, this quote and your use of it are misleading — the whole point of the NSA getting this information is not because they are information packrats, hoarding phone records like Abhi hoards stamps for his collection, but precisely so they can decide which conversations they want to listen to or record — which, as already has been reported and confirmed ad nauseum, the NSA is in fact doing without getting warrants or otherwise submitting to judicial oversight. (And of course there was plenty of outrage in December about this general issue. What’s new now is the revelation that the telecoms have cooperated with the NSA on such a massive scale, which was not widely noted until now.) And how do we know, anyway, that the Bush administration is only surveilling “terrorists” and not “innocent people”? Just because they say so — “trust us”? (Kind of like when the Solicitor General stood up before the Supreme Court, just before Abu Ghraib broke, and told the Court that the Bush administration doesn’t engage in torture”? Or maybe you have in mind Rumsfeld’s comment at the start of the Iraq War to the effect that he “knew where the WMDs were”?) That’s the whole reason why we have a warrant requirement — so there is some judicial oversight to check the executive’s investigative powers.

    First of all this hysteria over people being investigated is what’s really misleading. Having phone records is not new for the gov’t, nor is it for many companies and telemarketers either. Now I don’t see it as a problem, since they are NOT just randomly listening in on innocent people’s conversations or looking at all their info. They are trying to track down al-Qaida and their communications, which I should think we’d all want them to do. I’m sick of hearing “oh, they’re spying on Americans.” This is a gross misstatement of what they are trying to do.

    The issue isn’t simply that I don’t care if they want to look at my phone records. What are they gonna find? Me talking to my grandmother or getting a call-in from work or a friend asking to hang out, probably. Big deal. I’m not revealing anything over the phone that would be earthshattering.

    So what if they know what my phone number is? They are only gonna delve further into my records if they think there is an al-Qaida connection. So if there is a connection, I’d like to know it too. Go ahead, track my phone number.

    This isn’t an illegal infringement. Other Presidents, including President Bush’s predecessor, dealt with the issue of comminications surveillence.

  2. One more thing. Secrecy in some of these areas is a valuable tool against the enemy. I don’t necessarily need to be told that my phone records are in a database and may or may not be subject to evaluation if a connection to al-Qaida is suspected. I think I should be notified if i am going to be charged with a crime or with aiding a crime, but the fact that my records are available for review is not something I have to know.

  3. What are you all? Idiots this is taking away our freedom this is how it all begins!!