U.S. aid after the horrific quake in Pakistan (higher death toll than the Gujarat and Bam temblors) is already being spun by the politicos in Washington:
“Musharraf is a friend and hero in our eyes,” said one senior U.S. official… “There is a clear and unmistakable signal being sent that we help our friends.” [Link]
Who gets credit for eight U.S. helicopters and three field hospitals? Round and round and round it goes, where it stops, nobody knows:
A survey of 1,200 Indonesians one month after the tsunami… found that, for the first time, more Indonesians (40 percent) supported the U.S. terrorism fight than opposed it (36 percent). Sixty-five percent of those surveyed had a more favorable impression of the United States, with support strongest among those younger than 30, while support for Osama bin Laden dropped from 58 percent before the tsunami to 23 percent. Terror Free Tomorrow is a nonpartisan group that studies popular support for global terrorism. [Link]
<
p>Indonesian support for bin Laden dropped from 58% before the tsunami to 23%after U.S. aidOne expert thinks the U.S. will reap the benefits, but Musharraf will not. The Pakistani government’s quake relief has seemingly been as ineffectual as the U.S. government’s Katrina response:
Husain Haqqani, director of the Center for International Relations at Boston University and an adviser to Terror Free Tomorrow, said the experience in Indonesia could easily be replicated in Pakistan… But Haqqani said the U.S. effort to prop up Musharraf with the relief effort is unlikely to succeed. He said hard questions are already being asked about the faltering response of the Pakistani military, which Musharraf controls. Moreover, he said, much of the $1 billion in annual U.S. aid that Pakistan receives is perceived as going toward buying F-16 fighter planes and toward supporting the state, not the common people. “The man in the street has not been the beneficiary of the U.S. aid” in the past, so credit for the disaster relief will flow to the United States, not to Musharraf… [Link]
The irony is that because this disaster happened outside U.S borders, there was probably less red tape (and a political agenda to achieve) involved in getting U.S. military aid there as compared to New Orleans. Though I doubt it will change any local opinions about the U.S. Am surprised nobody in that area had not yet blamed some U.S secret weapon for causing the earthquake.
I’m sure the day is not too far off when corporations like Coke and McDonalds or Pizza Hut will sponsor relief/aid flights. Let’s go shower the poor disaster victims with sugary sodas and french fries, on top of medicine, supplies, clothes, etc. The corporate sponsors will think, “these poor people will be so grateful to us and then we’ll have snagged their brand loyalty when we bulldoze their homes to build 3 new locations…”
DD that is a fascinating point. A little satirical right now, but who knows what the future holds? If the CEOs of those corps are reading this right now…quick, patent your idea!
I was listening to an interview with a Dawn columnist yesterday, who correctly pointed out that Musharraf is in fact using Katrina as an excuse for the lack of relief efforts. There was an audio clip of Musharraf explaining that “even the US” could not get relief to New Orleans in time, and so he couldn’t be blamed for the lack of effective relief work.
I’m sure the day is not too far off when corporations like Coke and McDonalds or Pizza Hut will sponsor relief/aid flights. Let’s go shower the poor disaster victims with sugary sodas and french fries, on top of medicine, supplies, clothes, etc. The corporate sponsors will think, “these poor people will be so grateful to us and then we’ll have snagged their brand loyalty when we bulldoze their homes to build 3 new locations…”
I’d say let them do it. These folks need all the carbs they can get. Besides, corps do not need the brand loyalty to bulldoze the houses of their patrons, they just have to pay chump-change to the local thug-leaders, which is cheap, quick and hassle free.
This disaster is so heartbreaking. I saw the footage of a little boy who was trapped (eventually rescued). The quiet demeanor of this boy rattled me. It seemed to me that he had figured it all out. CanÂ’t get that out of head.
HereÂ’s how it should happen. – Send the bloodsucking corporations first. – Then the gentle missionaries who would serve and then convert some of them. – Then send in the “re-converters” to re-convert the converted and to supply more stuff.
Eight choppers isn’t all that exciting, considering we’re talking (conservatively) about 5 million homeless survivors dealing with the onset of winter in the Himalayas.
U.S government officials think they’re rewarding Musharraf. But they may be rewarding a dead duck: if things stay as bad as they currently are, I don’t know if anything can save his government from angry, desperate survivors…
Tariq Ali made a snide comment about it in the Guardian yesterday: there are dozens, if not hundreds of U.S. choppers within 500 miles of this earthquake (i.e., at the Pak/Afghanistan border) –where are they?
Ali’s comment may be off the mark (I have my doubts about whether U.S. attack helicopters could be useful for delivering aid). But it’s worth considering, at least as a statement about the U.S.’s real priorities for Pakistan.
Well, it’s 8 for now and 30 more promised, and as you note they’re presumably heavy lift choppers.
I wonder why all the Middle Eastern countries aren’t helping out (especially the rich Gulf States), especially with regards to sending large numbers of on-the-ground manpower to assist disaster-recovery and survivor-rescue efforts.
Obviously charity doesn’t begin at home in the Middle East. On these occasions they do want Western involvement…
Vikram,
So much for the much-vaunted “global unity of the Ummah (especially against the ‘infidel’)”….
I hope all those wannabe jihadists out there — especially those born and brought up in the West — are taking notice of the fact that the very people they despise are the ones who are a) sending on-the-ground manpower and b) in the cases of ordinary citizens, have volunteered/raised — and are continuing to raise — millions of pounds/dollars to help the victims of this disaster. Plus of course the larger sums donated by the various Western governments.
If the fundies have any decency and integrity at all then they’ll do some serious thinking about all this.
Highly doubtful that the wannabe Western jihadists will change their twisted thinking. This guy’s own mother was rescued from the WTC … you can see how it inspired him: Mohammed Junaid Babar .
I think all this pretty much adds further evidence to the hypocrisy of the fanatics.
JaiSingh writes: >>If the fundies have any decency and integrity at all then they’ll do some serious thinking about all this
One does not use the words “fundies” and “thinking” in the same sentence.
M. Nam
Pakistan in a state of complete distress… 🙁
ah the joys of democracy and capitalism… we can just buy our support from others around the world. excellent, smithers.
getting off the cynical bandwagon, i actually think this statistic is pretty impressive… it might be a sign of people buying into the benefits of political freedoms that will eventually motivate change in the country
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/11/AR2005101101884.html
According to this WashPo article, the usually benevolent American public arent flinging many coins at Pakistan. Donor fatigue? Perhaps, but I think the public’s less than estimable perception of Pakistan has a ‘lil to do with it.
How about they hand over AQ Khan and we’ll build them a Levittown in the center of Muzzafarabad?
Like I mentioned in my earlier post that there wouldn’t be any real gratefulness for American aid in the log term:
U.S. Choppers Ferry Injured From Pakistan
Not surprising that there has been a somewhat underwhelming response in aid.
Your corelation between political freedom and change is incorrect here. There was no real hatred for the US even when they did NOT have political freedom.Track back to the days of Suharto. They were more or less pro West. Its only around 2001 that anti US sentiments increased.