Since we were just discussing the merits (or absurdity) of Brad Pitt in a movie about the life of the Buddha, I thought it would be appropriate to point out Halle Berry’s upcoming role as “Vanita Gupta.” From Apunkachoice.com:
Academy Award winner Halle Berry is likely to play the role of an India-born law graduate in America, Vanita Gupta, whose campaign helped overturning the judicial ruling in one of the biggest drug bust cases in the US.
Vanita Gupta is like the Erin Brockovich for the colored people in the Texas town of Tulia where 10 percent of its African-American population was arrested in a drug bust case in 1999, based on the sole testimony of under-cover narcotics agent Thomas Coleman, who was also a Ku Klux Klan member.
Halle Berry portraying an Indian woman, though? Well a short haired Halle does look a little like Arundhati Roy doesn’t she? Well…the face at least. I am quite sure their bodies aren’t as similar.
The real Vanita Gupta rocks– she’s in her mid-20s and argued the fake drug bust by a corrupt narc agent, which received national attention, all the way up to pardon by the governor of Texas. She only got out of NYU Law three years ago!
Here’s the NYT on the Tulia case:
Here’s Crime Library.
So, there were no desi actresses available? This would have been a good opportunity to cast a desi woman outside of the hospital, especially considering the woman being portrayed is actually an Indian-American.
I am quite sure their bodies arenÂ’t as similar.
yeah…i don’t think halle berry’s body is QUITE as twisted with hate as arundhati roy’s is:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4266289,00.html
That is cool. Halle is gorgeous. I dont mind her playing Indian. At least she is brown, unlike that Matrix clown who played Buddha.
gc
Regarding the quotation you gave from Arundhati Roy; the logic of the radical left often mirrors the logic of the radical right. As an example, when Hindu extremists demolished the Babri Masjid they said it was in retaliation for the excesses of Muslim rulers…what goes around comes around. According to Arundhati that is wrong, but killing Americans is alright because what goes around comes around.
The state of India has commited many crimes. If some psychopath decided to kill thousands of innocent New Delhites to avenge that in a September 11th style attack, no doubt she would say it was OK, that what goes around comes around. Alternatively, she could herself be killed in the same process, or one of her loved ones, and be free to reflect in heaven that its OK, my mother/husband/brother/myself deserved to be blown into one hundred pieces because I am part of a country/people/religion that “had it coming” and what goes around comes around…just like those pesky Muslims and Sikhs who were killed by the forces she opposes.
What a putrid statement.
As I said, the radical right and the radical left are closer to each other tahn they realise.
It’s not just, or even mainly, Roy. Roy may have made those comments sitting in India, but here are Pat Robertson and Jerry Fallwell on the 700 club, discussing the 9/11 attacks just two days later:
Twisted with hate, just like you said.
Better quotes from Robertson:
The real Vanita Gupta has more negroid features than Halle. Halle infact looks like a tanned white woman.
Ennis, Punjabi boy, for once I am in 100% agreement.
So “The Namesake”, which focuses on Indian-American characters, is set to star actors mostly from India. Tamyra Gray has a lead role in Bombay Dreams, and Halle Berry is now rumored to play an Indian-American lawyer. Naveen Andrews (Lost) and Ravi Kapoor (Crossing Jordan) are both from the UK. Are there no opportunities for struggling Indian-American actors?
None. Tell them to grow up and go to med school, like their moms told them they should!
How can you compare Halle Berry with Arundhati Roy? Roy’s beauty is delicate yet her features are strong and striking at the same time. She has a quiet dignity and a strengh of character that Halle cannot even come close to (no offense Halle). She is also charismatic and posseses a type of intellecutal bravery that is not evident in many women – Indian or American. I think many Indians are up in arms about Roy because she questions the conventional wisdom of today’s India. As long as she criticizes the west, and in particular America, Indians are more than happy to run with it. Unfortunately for such people, Roy does not perceive the world through such a simplistic dichotomy (India the good vs America the bad). Instead, she addresses inequality wherever it is practiced,and God knows India is guilty of this like any other nation. India can only free herself from third world misery once she realizes that it is the inherent right of all human beings to live as equals.