{"id":2179,"date":"2005-09-09T14:48:16","date_gmt":"2005-09-09T19:48:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com?p=2179"},"modified":"2005-09-09T13:00:36","modified_gmt":"2005-09-09T18:00:36","slug":"apology_issued_1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/2005\/09\/09\/apology_issued_1\/","title":{"rendered":"Apology issued for mislabeled &#8220;package&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.dnamagazine.com.au\/\"><img alt=\"\" hspace=20 src=\"http:\/\/www.sepiamutiny.com\/sepia\/DNAcensored.jpg\" align=right vspace=10 border=0><\/a>I bet you are all wondering (well <em>at least<\/em> those that swing from a particular&nbsp;side of the plate) what&#8217;s under that forbidden black box (who says SM only&nbsp;features pics of&nbsp;hot women?).&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/seyd.com\/2005\/09\/08\/laxmi-brief-part-2\/\" target=_blank>Seyd tips me off<\/a> to yet another one of those &#8220;I can&#8217;t believe they put a Hindu&nbsp;icon on <em>that<\/em>,&#8221; controversies (see previous <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sepiamutiny.com\/sepia\/archives\/001550.html\" target=_blank>1<\/a>,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sepiamutiny.com\/sepia\/archives\/001057.html\" target=_blank>2<\/a>).&nbsp; Now my position on this is that I personally don&#8217;t care one way or another since I don&#8217;t concern myself with religious icons.&nbsp; Other people get upset and sue over this stuff and it&#8217;s their prerogative to do so.&nbsp; So what is the situation here?&nbsp; <a href=\"http:\/\/rainbownetwork.com\/News\/detail.asp?iData=23922&#038;iCat=29&#038;iChannel=2&#038;nChannel=News\" target=_blank>Rainbownetwork.com has the details<\/a>:<\/p>\n\n<blockquote>DNA Magazine, Australia&#8217;s top gay publication, has censored their latest cover <strong>in an effort to quell outrage from the Hindu community<\/strong>. <\/p>\n<p>The cover features male fitness star Matt Walch wearing a Roberto Cavalli brief that is screen printed with an image of the Hindu goddess Laxmi. \n<p>In a letter to the Hindu community, Editor Andrew Creagh, apologized for the offence and let it known that the magazine <strong>had no &#8220;deliberate intention to cause offence, antagonize or show disrespect to people of the Hindu faith.&#8221;<\/strong> \n<p>He added that the magazine was &#8220;unaware that the garment portrayed a specific Hindu deity.&#8221;<\/blockquote>\n\n<p>That sounded like a pretty sincere apology.&nbsp; I mean he&#8217;s not going to pull the magazine off the shelves or anything because then they&#8217;d lose money, but at least on their website there is a black box over the bacon.&nbsp; What truly offends me is that the picture is of the goddess Laxmi.&nbsp; If they had even <em>half<\/em> a brain they would have more appropriately offended the Hindu community by using an iconic image of&nbsp;the Hindu diety that is associated with the&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lingam\" target=_blank>Lingam<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n<p>Also, although I&#8217;ve been meaning to invest in a good thong, I don&#8217;t think that I would buy this design.  The last thing I need is for a conflicted Hindu girl to re-discover religion at the&#8230;ummm&#8230;wrong moment.<\/p>\n\n<p>So you guys want to see what is under that black box?&nbsp; Click below (might not be safe for work).<\/p>\n\n<p><!--more--><center><img alt=\"\" hspace=20 src=\"http:\/\/www.sepiamutiny.com\/sepia\/DNAuncensored.jpg\" align=baseline vspace=10 border=0><\/center><\/p>\n\n<p>And in case you have poor vision:<\/p>\n\n<p><center><img alt=\"\" hspace=20 src=\"http:\/\/www.sepiamutiny.com\/sepia\/DNAcloseup.jpg\" align=baseline vspace=10 border=0><\/center><\/p>\n\n<p>Seyd asks:<\/p>\n\n<blockquote>I wonder who&#8217;s the Hindu community they are referring to. The straight Hindu community? More than likely, because I checked several gay Desi sources and the magazine has slipped under their radar. Which makes me think, how did the straight Hindu community hear about this? Suspicious&#8230; <\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I bet you are all wondering (well at least those that swing from a particular&nbsp;side of the plate) what&#8217;s under that forbidden black box (who says SM only&nbsp;features pics of&nbsp;hot women?).&nbsp; Seyd tips me off to yet another one of &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/2005\/09\/09\/apology_issued_1\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1,14],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2179"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2179"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2179\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sepiamutiny.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}