The Washington Post reports that the U.S. may have misled its Allies into thinking that North Korea was actively helping build a new nuclear weapons state (Libya) instead of simply supplying an existing one (Pakistan):

In an effort to increase pressure on North Korea, the Bush administration told its Asian allies in briefings earlier this year that Pyongyang had exported nuclear material to Libya. That was a significant new charge, the first allegation that North Korea was helping to create a new nuclear weapons state.

But that is not what U.S. intelligence reported, according to two officials with detailed knowledge of the transaction. North Korea, according to the intelligence, had supplied uranium hexafluoride — which can be enriched to weapons-grade uranium — to Pakistan. It was Pakistan, a key U.S. ally with its own nuclear arsenal, that sold the material to Libya. The U.S. government had no evidence, the officials said, that North Korea knew of the second transaction.

Pakistan’s role as both the buyer and the seller was concealed to cover up the part played by Washington’s partner in the hunt for al Qaeda leaders, according to the officials, who discussed the issue on the condition of anonymity. In addition, a North Korea-Pakistan transfer would not have been news to the U.S. allies, which have known of such transfers for years and viewed them as a business matter between sovereign states.

Of course, this may shed light on exactly what some of Condoleezza Rice’s OTHER business was on her trip to India and East Asia.

In an effort to repair the damage, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is traveling through East Asia this weekend trying to get the six-nation talks back on track. The impasse was expected to dominate talks today in Seoul and then Beijing, which wields the greatest influence with North Korea.

And let’s end with the obligatory conclusion,

“The administration is giving Pakistan a free ride when they don’t deserve it and hurting U.S. interests at the same time,” said Charles L. Pritchard, who was the Bush administration’s special envoy for the North Korea talks until August 2003.

Continue reading →

Reading the comments following my post yesterday on Modi, as well as following the comments on other websites, I have decided to do a follow up post on the situation so that I may forward a theory. Several of you think of it as a “snub against India” the way the U.S. seemingly bipassed normal channels in order to issue this censure of Modi. The word “hypocrisy” has also been thrown around quite liberally. Some of you ask, why deny Modi but not the President of China or the heads of states of other countries that have been known to commit religious or human rights violations? Let us look at the political ramifications of what happened yesterday by assuming for a moment that the U.S. and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh (or his representative) HAD discussed the issue PRIOR to the Modi decision and that this WASN’T a surprise at all but a carefully planned political bushwhack.

Let’s first look at this article in Rediff:

Though sources close to the Gujarat government in Gandhinagar and the Bharatiya Janata Party leadership in New Delhi indicated to rediff.com correspondents that the decision to deny Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi a visa to visit the United States was taken at the embassy level in New Delhi, without consultation with the State Department in Washington, DC, senior Bush administration officials have told rediff.com that this is not correct.

The officials said the decision to deny Modi a visa was taken at the highest levels and US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was apprised every step of the way during her travels in Asia.

“She is the Secretary of State,” the officials said, “and she knows all about what is going on that is important at the State Department.”

The officials acknowledged there were security concerns over the visit because of the large protests that were being organised and also because some of the cities where Modi was slated to speak had not been aware what a controversial figure he was and may not have been taking the necessary security precautions in terms of assigning police personnel and taking other preventive measures.

Continue reading →