Thirty-five years ago, today, the first wave of South Asians who were expelled from Uganda by Idi Amin landed in the UK.
At the time Amin gained power, Uganda’s Indian community, numbering approximately 80,000 in total, was comprised of Hindis, Muslims, and Ismalis(sic). [link]
Here’s why they left:
President Amin has denounced the Ugandan Asians as “bloodsuckers”, and warned that any remaining in the country after 8 November risk being imprisoned in military camps. [BBC]
Bloodsuckers, eh? Takes one to know them, or imagine them, I guess. Consider this horrific story:
A 75-year old retired chartered accountant Natubhai Shah, who is living in Ahmedabad, recalled Amin’s reign of terror in an interview with ‘The Times of India’, “Here I was, on an official tour with Idi Amin’s entourage, trying to cross the Nile River when a military van stopped me from going ahead.
One of the army men discreetly handed me a pair of binoculars. It was a chilling sight. Amin was standing beside the river, cutting flesh off an Asian man and feeding it to crocodiles in the river.” [HT]
Also, what exactly were Uganda’s desis threatened with? The BBC article states “imprisonment”, but a case study I found, which focuses on one woman’s personal account of this nightmare, suggests something far more heinous.
Dr. Sunita Sundaram, an ethnically Asian Ismali(sic), was a medical student in Uganda’s capital, Kampala, when Amin announced that all Asians must leave the country within three months time or be killed. [Harvard]
Even as Ugandans followed Amin’s outrageous directions and fled, they were terrorized:
Kassem Osman – who arrived with his wife, two brothers and their families – said they had been robbed by the soldiers.
“On the way to the airport the coach was stopped by troops seven time and we were all held at gun point,” he said. [BBC]
But why did this even happen? Back to Dr. Sundaram, who, in the study I linked to, discussed two significant causes for why Uganda turned on its South Asian community:
Uganda was broken up into three distinct and segregated racial groups in the early seventies. There were the white English colonizers who remained in the country after Uganda gained independence in the 60s, the Asian community who had immigrated to Uganda, Tanzania, and Kenya about one hundred years earlier, and finally you had a host of tribes who were native to Uganda.
The second major factor contributing to the hostility towards Asians cited by Dr. Sundaram was economic. In large part the Asian community in both Uganda and Tanzania controlled commerce within those countries. The vast majority of businesses were owned and run by Asians, creating a scenario where a few thousand people controlled a vast portion of the country’s wealth. This economic stratification between the various ethnic groups was a relic of Uganda’s days as an English colony, and native Ugandans were anxious to redistribute economic resources in a more equitable manner. In fact, following independence, several pieces of legislation were passed in an effort to encourage the redistribution of wealth. For example, in both Uganda and Tanzania all new business owners were required to find an ethnically Tanzanian or Ugandan business partner. [Harvard]
Though Amin is dead, desis in Uganda are once again a target for resentment and rage; 35 years after they were cast out of their homes for being too successful, they are once again cast as Uganda’s villains. Earlier this year, in April, a Hindu temple was attacked. Various news reports I read mentioned a lynching and Indian people being stoned to death. We covered it, here.
A lot of mutineers have roots in Uganda/Africa. Today, which must be especially painful, you are in my thoughts.
::
The photograph I used is a recent one; it is Devang Rawal’s mother, mourning her murdered son. Rawal was one of the desis killed in the April riots of this year.
Thank you for posting this important story on the news tab, Mutterpaneer.
I’m hoping Msichana and our other commenters who are from/have roots there chime in, too.
Camille said:
I’m not aware of this Camille, would you mind expanding?
Years ago, I read a review of a travelog by Paul Theroux (do I hear boos?)and he was pretty snooty about Africa, but one thing that sticks in my crawl was a conversation with an Ugandan about the departed Indians. The Ugandan said that Indians “would sit in their shops and go like this [he made a counting motion with his fingers]; they would sit and do that all day long. It was very annoying. Our people are not like that.” So, out with the annoying counters. However,the shops were never re-opened. Theroux surmised that what the man was describing was the simple activity of taking inventory, boring and time-consuming, but necessary to any well-run business. If the Ugandans don’t want to do it, if it is beneath them or something, then somebody is going to have to do it. I mean, it’s not like the ugandans took the shops over. So I don’t get it.
DTK in #36 mentions Amy Chua’s book “World on Fire”–it’s come up on SM many times and is well worth your time. The book outlines what Chua calls “market dominant minorities,” insular ethnic or immigrant groups that dominate a trade or sector, make lots of money, and are resented by the poorer indigenous population. The Ugandan Asians are one of her examples (along with the Chinese in SE Asia, Jews in Russia, Lebanese in various places, Hutus/Tutsis, etc.). The book begins with the story of the murder of Chua’s aunt in the Philippines. Her family is Chinese–the woman was killed by Filipino servant (link).
One interesting thing from the fallout after the Idi Amin purge: the Aga Khan promised to safeguard the Ismaili community against similar actions in the future anywhere in the world. After Uganda, he lobbied other countries like Canada to receive and resettle refugees. He also promised financial and logistical support (much like the Israeli airlifts out of the Russia). The result is that the considerably wealthy Ismaili communities in Africa have plowed their resources into his community development philanthropies. There are Aga Khan schools, orphanages, trade projects, hotels, hospitals (many of them world class) all over Africa, and the interesting thing is that the target for these services isn’t usually people of Indian descent (they don’t need them) but black Africans. Helping the poor and less fortunate is central to Ismaili life, and it’s the right thing to do, of course, and in Africa, it’s had the added effect of making the Ismaili community (and Indians generally) more secure.
Despite the more recent events in Uganda, which Anna mentions (and the story there is more complex than it seems), it’s really hard to imagine a government-sponsored ethnic backlash against Indians in east or South Africa (yes, there will always be communal flareups of one sort or another, but that’s an entirely different thing from a repeat of the Amin event).
was doing some googling–is there anything to the story that Amin wanted to marry a woman from the Madvani family and of course, this was not possible as far the Indians were concerned? And this caused his tsunami against the desis? After all, he was a psycho.
Shalu, please see my response in #47 to Clueless for a little background information on the UK Home Office’s “diversion” policy.
Umm as far as I know….there are no longer Jewish quotas(at least since WWII) at any university in the US, nor would they be legal. The only groups capable of benefiting from such help are underrepresented minorities…..some say to the detriment of Asians and Indians…but thats another story.
I’m from Kenya and my folks and siblings still live there. I also have friends who live in Uganda. They went back after Yoweri Museveni took over in the mid eighties. One of the things that drove people back was the promise of business opportunities and the transfer of property to their names despite Idi Amin seizing them. A lot of them are loaded now because they struck where the iron was hot. I know that the same is happening with Somalia where a lot of Indians are venturing out for business ventures. Heck, I know folks who are in Congo right this minute, dipping their fingers in the diamond trade.
Having grown in Kenya, the one thing I can say is that the general animosity and distrust between the Asian Indian community and the native blacks is something that is definitely two sided. Inter-marriage between the two groups is very uncommon and the general idea is that the Indians are foreigners who are mooching off the motherland and the blacks are the kind of people that need to be controlled the way the colonialists did. Of course, there are exceptions to this but that’s the general idea.
I was born at the Aga Khan hospital in Nairobi. From what my folks says, it seems like most communities stayed within their comfort zones – Goan Assoc and such. My father in Goa,until recently, was frequently visited by good Goan friends from Canada he hadn’t seen for decades and I have never seen him happier than when he was hosting them. My mother has always kept in touch with a couple of Gujarati friends of hers in Australia. I wish I could elicit more info from the folks about interaction between groups, without sounding like Barbara W. I know my parents decided to leave Nairobi due to the growing political/social instability of the mid-sixties(a sudden absence of our ‘ayah’ being a small scale manifestation), but I have never got a good idea of how the Goans fared in Uganda.
Seveleven, I have heard that rumour too. Mayur Madhwani was one of the first Asians to make it big there. I believe he left Uganda during the exodus, went to UK and then returned.
Preston, you are very right about this. From time to time, a politician like Kenneth Matiba will start to rile up disgruntled and jobless young people and get them to riot against the asian invasion etc, but it doesn’t always bear fruit. With the exception of some Asians who get famous because of their criminal business deals like Ketan Somaia and Kamlesh Pattni, majority of the Indians in E.Africa tend to stay under the radar. The people in power understand the economic clout that the community wields.
My grandparents, my mom, and my uncle went through this. They have told me that the UK was trying to divert skilled desis to America, and that’s how they ended up in Houston. So I’m pretty sure a lot of refugees came to America. Kenya and neighboring countries all closed their borders, so families couldn’t join each other there, either. From their stories, the worst part was the concentration camps they had to stay in for a while. I can’t imagine being subject to that.
@Camille–they do speak Swahili–most kids have to take it in school. My dad, uncle, aunt and grandparents still speak in Swahili when they don’t want us to understand what they’re talking about.
Camille, that is still the case. I have family in Tanzania that speaks the kind of Kiswahili poetry is written in while my mom, who grew up in india, has a more desified version. I speak the business tongue better because that is what I learnt in school. However, I know of desis who actually speak dialects such as Kikuyu pretty well too.
Sad to see they might been hit with more racism once they hit the UK. There’s a movie called ‘This is England’ showing skinheads in 80’s UK. The skinhead were blaming there unemployement on the south asians. Here’s a scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc4XX3QcRJY
Interesting coming from someone who was rumored to be somewhat of a cannibal himself!
I have met people that were displaced by this, but I never understood this situation. This rarely gets any media attention in the US. Can someone please mention a good book concerning this topic?
Someone I know told me the story of how when she was talking to high-powered black politicians in Trinidad, they started talking about the Indian population “like the white colonialists did about the blacks” (her words, and she’s a black Trinidadian).
The No.1 Ladies’ Detective Agency, by Alexander McCall Smith (it’s about a female private investigator in Botswana, sometime in the ’70s I believe) has an amusing bit about how the P.I. is hired to follow the daughter of a local Indian businessman and make sure she doesn’t have a boyfriend. The girl ends up fooling the Mma Ramotswe into thinking that she’s just going on ‘dates’ with herself (to stick it to her dad), and after Mma has told her father this, she finds the girl at the mall hand-in-hand with some white d00d. heh.
Uh, the point of that little anecdote was to show that I’m continuously awestruck by how widespread and vibrant the desi diaspora is. Part of my family lives in Kenya, and I know relations there still aren’t that great. Thanks for this post anna.
Could anything (peaceful) have been done to prevent a dictator like Amin take over? Did he appear like a Hitler in the early stages of his rise to power? Of course, he acted like Hitler after taking over Uganda.
Uganda was a really sad situation. And even though there are horrible atrocities raging right now, like Sudan and Iraq, it’s still hard to believe something like this could have happened not so long ago. Even sadder that this continues today.
Knowing so many people around the world have had experiences of such extreme violence and hardship, it is curious to see that it continues. This tells me that their stories are not being told enough, so I am grateful to forums like SM doing their part. It would be great if such survivors were able to do more to speak out against/fight such human rights violations today. However, I understand and am very sensitive to the fact that they have the right to mourn and cope with the trauma they have faced both in their own way and on their own terms.
Also relating to this, I just rented The Last King of Scotland from netflix and have yet to watch it. But for those who don’t know, it is heavily based on a British doctor’s experience in Amin’s Uganda. It received tons of critical acclaim. Does someone who has watched the film know whether it portrays this particular tragedy?
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/last_king_of_scotland/
naz– I saw it, and my memory is fuzzy, but I think it did show Asian families packing up and leaving, in the streets, etc. This was near the climax of the movie I think. SPOILER SPOILER
SPOILER If I remember correctly, the main character gets away on a plane to england that is full of mostly Asian families.
<<>>
IFOB hit the nail on the head. That is is the sole reason Africans still hate Indians (Asians). We never bothered nor cared to integrate or respect the black African. All we (Indian businessman) cared about was making money off them. We never contributed to charities, helped the poor, etc….
thanks for the warning, but i don’t mind the spoiler. i’m sure it’s still worth a view.
also, just wanted to say the first time i heard about the expulsion of indians from uganda was in mira nair’s film Mississippi Masala, which did a decent portrayal of the terror that erupted.
i wonder which other films have portrayed this event, does anyone know of any other american, indian, or british films that have?
ANECDOTE FROM BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/september/18/newsid_3113000/3113720.stm
Nikesh Patel was seven-years-old when his family was expelled from Uganda.
“We could only take the equivalent of £5 with us. Of course Uganda became a buyers’ paradise as Asians began to offload all their life-long possessions.
“I clearly remember a Ugandan gentleman coming home to see and then buy our sofas.
“The journey to the UK was bewildering to say the least. We chose to depart on a Monday night BOAC flight – we did not have UK visas (though we held UK passports and were UK citizens).
‘Awfully cold’
“But on Mondays the immigration staff were worse for wear after a weekend of indulgence – so we got through with no hassle.
“Upon arriving in the UK I remember it was awfully cold, and we were met by a whole phalanx of cameramen and journalists – my head was spinning.
“Duly we were despatched to a detention centre in Feltham as we did not have visas.
“So there was I, a seven-year-old, forced to leave my country of birth to go to another country I had barely heard of, and had the pleasure of staying in a detention centre the first week of arrival.
Nikesh Patel “Saying that, the detention centre was great. The staff were kind, and allowed us to do what we pleased except escape.
“I have been in the UK ever since. I feel grateful to the UK for taking us in – though this is tinged with the latter knowledge that it was UK government policy that brought Amin to power – so a part of me truly feels that the UK deserved to be dumped upon by thousands of Asians.
“Anyway we are well settled now, many of us are highly successful due to hard work and the opportunities that living in a developed nation brings with it.
“Ultimately I suppose we have to be grateful to Mr Amin. But he was an absolute monster – Asians suffered very minimally compared to the indigenous Ugandans we left behind.”
The wiki page on the book.
Quoting from it:
The racial politics of the Caribbean are very complex and not entirely analogous the situation of Indians and blacks in Africa. In some Caribbean countries, like Guyana and Trinidad, the black and Indian populations are roughly equal–each is just under half the population. At various times, the governments are controlled by black parties or Indian parties. The racial dynamic is entrenched but only as a feature of the mid-20th century, when these places became independent of Britain. You can’t really say that Guyana or Trinidad, for example, has native population (the pre-colonial tribal people were annihilated). Those countries have two racially distinct groups vying for control. Each demonizes the other.
But Indians in the Caribbean tend to be better off economically as a community, in part because remittances from the diaspora in North America and Britain are very strong.
So Sanjay and IFOB, Then I guess Jewish racism is the reason why Jews were gassed in Europe, and Chinese racism is the reason why Chinese are treated like $hit in Indonesia and Malaysia, and I guess Indian racism towards whites is the reason why sometimes there is isolated violence against Indians and Indian-Americans in the US, Black Racism towards white Americans is the reason why Blacks were and are still treated badly in the US ,Right? According to you there can NEVER be Black African racism directed towards Indian-origin Africans, right?
Uh-oh–you sound like a victim of post-Camille “sensitivity training”–stiff upper lip, old egg! (I kid.)
Camille–you’re right, I didn’t read your original post closely enough
Naz/Nala–re The Last King of Scotland. The movie moved some events around and changed some facts (e.g., it shows one of Amin’s wives being killed and dismembered for having an affair with the white Scottish doctor who is the central character in the novel; it is true that she was killed in the manner shown in the movie, but allegedly for having an affair with Mbalu-Mukasa, a Ugandan doctor) to suit the narrative, but I think it got a lot of things right. It does depict Amin’s expulsion of the Asian community and the chaos that ensues. The white guy gets away by sneaking onto a plane of hostages being released during the Entebbe rescue.
I saw the movie on DVD a few weeks ago, and I thought the movie was great. The DVD extras–in particular, the short documentary on Amin and interviews with Ugandan cast members–were terrific.
sanjay:All we (Indian businessman) cared about was making money off them.
Economics/trade/WealthCreation is not a zero-sum game. It is easy for most politicians to gain support with zero-sum rhetoric, than work hard educating people that their daily transactions are not zero-sum.
Bloodsucker is a leftist term for anyone who succeeds in business. Indians, especially gujaratis, were very business oriented in East Africa. Thus, they were labeled bloodsucker because in the leftist zero-sum worldview, anyone who gets ahead must mean someone got screwed. The word has been applied at various times to Jews pretty much anywhere outside the US, Chinese in Indonesia and other places in southeast Asia, and Lebanese in Africa. It excuses and allows the expression of hate and dehumanizes the ones on the receiving end.
As a brown person, the greatest thing about America is how little people here hate the rich. Most middle class Americans dont hate Sergey Brin or Bill Gates. Rather, they want to be as successful as them. Its only the extreme left of academia that breeds resentment of success these days. As long as business people are not hated in America, I will feel safe as a brown guy.
Before you go to those beautiful resorts in the Maldives, check out what they are doing to workers from Bangladesh right now:
Bangladeshi Castrated In Haa Daal Horror Death
And many of those resorts in the Maldives are owned and operated by Indian luxury groups–Taj, Oberoi, etc.
Indians are celebrated in the west for their ‘entrepreneurial spirit’, but Indians in Africa, Carib., and my homeland Fiji, had an altogether different experience. There the ‘desire for a better life’ was (and IS) used to dehumanize Indians:
http://www.culturecult.com/spiked1a.htm#dereliction
At a dinner given in his honor Theroux meets the vice-chancellor of the University of Malawi and a sometime Malawian ambassador to Germany. The subject of the expulsion of Indian traders and shop-keepers comes up. “The Indians were chased away,†says the ex-ambassador. “We wanted Africans to be given a chance to run the shops. So that Africans could go into business. The shops were handed over. I bought one myself!â€
With what result? asks Theroux.
Ha-ha! Not much. It didn’t work. They all got finished!
The result of this deliberate destruction of Indian commercial activity was that throughout Malawi’s rural areas there were soon no shops at all—“and, twenty-seven years later, still no shops.†When Theroux points this out the ex-ambassador turns to ridiculing Indian business acumen as a contemptible numerical obsession. “They sit there, you see, and they have these little pieces of paper, and have these columns of numbers. And one Indian is running the calculator, and another is counting the sacks of flour and the tins of condensed milk. One-two-three. One-two-three.â€
Theroux comments:
What this educated African in his plummy British voice intended as mockery—the apparent absurdity of all this counting—was the description of people doing a simple inventory of goods in a shop.
“We Africans are not raised in this way,†the ex-ambassador goes on, nodding to the others for approval. “What do we care about shops and counting? We have a much freer existence. We have no interest in this. Shops are not our strong point.†Then as the evening draws to a close he finally acknowledges another problem—the inability, in societies dominated by family, clan, and tribe, to protect one’s property from communal exploitation by parasitic relatives:
I’ll tell you why these shops didn’t work out, said the former ambassador, addressing the table at large. When Africans run businesses their families come and stay with them and eat all their food—just live off them. As soon as an African succeeds in something he has his family cadging from him. Not so?
That is true, brother, the other man said.
And we are not cut out for this shop-keeping and book-keeping and (he winked at me) this number crunching.
This infuriates Theroux:
I had never heard such bullsh*t… The man was saying: This is all too much for us. We cannot learn how to do business. We must be given money, we must be given sinecures, because we don’t know how to make a profit.
I said, If you’re no good at book-keeping and keeping track of expenses, why do you expect donor countries to go on giving you money?
Well Said Krish,It is non-PC,but a damned fact. Indians are resented because we did well in their countries when they couldnt. And after they ran the Indians out, screwed up their economies with their policies, the bowl was out again and the bowl continues to come out everytime the $hit hits the fan in these hellholes. Pointing this out is not racism but merely asking folks to take responsibility for their actions. It is time aid stopped to these countries and let them sink or swim. And let them have their “carefree” existence that they so desire.
Bro, I really can’t get over the irony. Brownies of the Silicon Valley mold are celebrated worldwide for their business acumen. But, Indians in the former British colonies are labelled selfish, greedy, and just about everything else… for showing that SAME entrepreneurial spirit.
The person who pointed out the lack of a political voice as the cause for the problems in India hit it directly on the head.
This is not so much true in the other places. But in those places, there is a great deal of xenophobia that is riled up by politicans to make people fear ‘Indian domination’ (a message that has the same effect on voters everywhere from Guyana to Fiji).
But, underlying it all is the kind of sentiment reflected in my previous post.
Im not supporting Amins’ actions whatsoever, but it is a little known that part of the reason for the resentment against the Asians living in Africa was not just becase of their economic progress, but that the money they did make in Africa was sent to foreign banks, ususally British ones, which upset the people living in Africa because it was the same as what the colonials had done to them earlier.
Krish***, I think one of the major gaps (around why you couldn’t transition shops/banking) was what the foreign minister implied — that once you succeed your whole family/community comes and expects you to share your wealth or give them free products –, and the other is that when desis occupied the mercantile class there wasn’t much opportunity for locals to get the training they needed to take it over (qualifier: in rural areas).
I don’t think that the characterization provided by the Malawian is entirely accurate, but I do think there was a bit of a skills vacuum after the initial expulsion. As Akash mentions, there was also resentment that people don’t invest locally and that they don’t promote/train black Africans or treat them fairly. I heard both complaints fairly regularly when I was in Jinja (Uganda) — that 1) Indians always send their money “back home” [to India], and 2) that they don’t treat us as human. Exceptions were of course viewed that way — as exceptions, that those people were “good Indians, more Ugandan than Indian” versus “bad Indians” who send their money oversees and treat you like a thief.
The places where Indians are resented for their economic success (where they are market-dominant minorities) are the places where general economic opportunity is unavailable. Indians are not resented in Silicon Valley because lots of non-Indians (and other ethnic groups) have made plenty of money. Indians are less resented in Kenya now than they were a generation ago because today there is a strong entrepreneurial black middle class.
Every diaspora country is different, and every Indian diaspora group has a different, often complicated, relationship with the country. Racial politics and economic politics are not the same thing, even if the economic conflict takes on racial tones.
What has made Indians so successful in places where economic opportunity is limited is that Indian diaspora groups are really good about leveraging collective resources, exploiting family and community ties, sharing profits, and taking care of each other. It’s like the law of compound interest. For many years, there is little to show, but after a decade, Indians can become quite wealthy, even in places with little wealth. And it’s not just one fat cat, but the whole community. So the locals resent without understanding.
This is not all necessarily to the long-term good. Indians in East Africa were active early on in the political systems of the various countries, but over time (and for many reasons) have abandoned politics (there are few Indian MPs, mayors, etc.). South African Indians have been, and still are, very politically active–and they are not a market-dominant minority and are not as wealthy collectively as their counterparts elsewhere in Africa.
If I were to list the ‘crimes’ that locals felt were comitted against them by Indians, the list could go on forever.
I’m sorry, but I have very little sympathy for that kind of sentiment. For one thing, the lists of ‘crimes’ are filled with half-truths and ‘perceived’ wrongs and some of the worst racial ideologies ever.
The recent unrest in Uganda was because an Indian conglomerate wanted to utilize protected forests for sugar cane farming. The rally which was called to protest the government concession started out masked as concern for the environment. But as the crowd grew larger, the xenophobic sentiment reared its ugly head and they rounded up and lynched an Indian man.
These Indian businessman are ruthless people. They use their power and position to foster uncompetitive and unsustainable practices–don’t forget corruption. They show very little concern for the environment or people, for that matter. Like monied people everywhere, they don’t care for anyone who doesn’t have it… regardless of race.
Unfortunately, when there is a backlash, they are the one’s who already have houses in other countries. The Indians left behind to deal with the mob violence are the unfortunate ones.
Regardless, the EMPTY ideologies which pop up to scapegoat Indians in these countries have to be pointed out.
Until they come up with evidence that Indians are getting bank officers to deny them loans to start businesses, I will have very little sympathy for them.