A NYT columnist tells a story of vengeance (paid link) that’s become all too familiar (thanks, Turbanhead). It’s got overtones of Mirch Masala, Krantiveer and Bandit Queen:
… in the central Indian city of Nagpur… [f]or more than 15 years, the mud alleys of the slum were ruled by a local thug named Akku Yadav. A higher-caste man, he killed, raped and robbed in this community of Dalits… One woman, according to people here, went to the police station to report that she had been gang-raped by Akku Yadav and his goons, and the police raped her.Neighbors tell how Akku Yadav forced a man to dance naked in front of his teenage daughter. They say that he chopped one woman into pieces in front of her daughter, and that another woman burned herself to death after he and his men gang-raped her…
<
p>Usha turned on the gas, grabbed a match and threatened to blow up everyoneWe have the bad guy, now we need the heroine. Usha Narayane, one of the few to leave the slum and get an education, was back home visiting relatives when the gang attacked. What Narayane managed to pull was like walking into a biker war with a hand grenade:
Akku Yadav returned with 40 men and surrounded the Narayane shack. He waved a bottle of acid and threatened to disfigure Usha’s face, and to rape and kill her… Usha turned on the gas, grabbed a match and threatened to blow up everyone if the gang broke into the house…
<
p>And finally, the Mirch Masala ending:
Soon a mob burned down Akku Yadav’s house… Hundreds of women marched from the slum to the courthouse. When Akku Yadav showed up, he spotted a woman he had raped and shouted that he would rape her again. She began beating him with her slipper.Women threw chili powder in the faces of Akku Yadav and the police, pulled out knives and took turns stabbing YadavOther women pulled out chili powder from their clothes and threw it in the faces of Akku Yadav and the police. As the police fled, scores of women pulled out knives and apparently took turns stabbing Akku Yadav and cutting off his penis. He ended up as mincemeat, and the courtroom walls are still spattered with blood.
The police arrested a handful of women, including Usha, for the murder, but she conveniently could prove that she was not at the courtroom that day. And then the hundreds of women in the slum jointly declared that they had all joined in the killing…
<
p>It’s sick that patriarchy and caste discrimination leads to this even today, and it’s even sicker that those who serve and protect are themselves the villains. Of course, the story has an ambivalent ending:
… the police harass her and her career as a hotel manager seems over. She is sure that other members of Akku Yadav’s gang will try to seek revenge by raping and killing her. But, undaunted, she is beginning a new life as a social activist…
<
p>If this is what education conveys, the fundamental idea that you have a right and a duty to fight back, then let’s spread a whole lotta edumacation around the subcontinent.
Oh we’re not gonna take it
no, we ain’t gonna take it
oh we’re not gonna take it anymore
it’s a powerful story, and i give props to usha.
my grumble is with nicholas kristof and the way he presented the story. the opening line of the column was something like (i paraphrase, because i can’t get the original due to the times select barrier, but perhaps someone can help): “the greatest moral challenge of the 21st century is gender equality in the developing world.”
and then he goes on to tell usha’s story.
i’m all for telling usha’s story. i’m extremely annoyed at that intro, however. for kristof to pontificate on the “greatest moral challenge” of the next 94 years and locate it in a way that specifically exempts his own country — and therefore himself — is narcissistic at best, colonialistic at worse.
we — meaning the world — have numerous moral challenges.
we also have social and economic challenges. reducing the fight for gender equality to its “moral” dimension risks obscuring the specific causes behind gender discrimination and injustice in each setting. in other words, even if i believe gender equality to be a moral cause, i can’t turn up in nagpur and tell them to change their way of ordering society simply because it is moral to do so. you have to bring something to the table beyond indignation.
in the wikipedia of my mind, look up “bleeding-heart liberal” and you find a picture of kristof. from darfur to nagpur this dude is all about finding injustice among the natives. again, i am all in favor of usha’s story being told. but what we make of the story depends much on how the messenger tells it.
peace & respects
Dude Manish,
I sent this tip to you guys two days ago. I even blogged on this Sunday night.
What happened to “equal” acknowledgments?
Kush, sorry, dude. I choose not to be on the tip line to reduce inbound email. And that should be obvious because the form tells you exactly who gets the emails.
Not to mention the FAQ right on the form:
Not to worry, Manish. I was giving you hard time.
“you have to bring something to the table beyond indignation.”
Siddhartha,
I have been saying this since the Day One I started visiting Sepia Mutiny. I agree.
“ItÂ’s sick that patriarchy and caste discrimination leads to this even today.” I agree about patriarchy, but where is there if any. a suggestion about caste in story? How did you conclude that caste discrimination lead to thuggery?
“How did you conclude that caste discrimination lead to thuggery?’
From Kristof’s article. He writes:
For more than 15 years, the mud alleys of the slum were ruled by a local thug named Akku Yadav. A higher-caste man, he killed, raped and robbed in this community of Dalits – those at the bottom of the caste ladder – and the police paid no attention.
PS: You need Time Select subscription to read it entirely
Thanks, I stand corrected.
Can someone post the article here – the one by Kristof
In India, One Woman’s Stand Says ‘Enough’ By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF
NAGPUR, India
The central moral challenge we will face in this century will be to address gender inequality in the developing world. Here in India, for example, among children ages 1 to 5, girls are 50 percent more likely to die than boys. That means that every four minutes, a little girl here is discriminated against to death.
One reason for such injustice is that many women docilely accept it — even enforce it. But that may be changing, as I found in a slum here in the central Indian city of Nagpur.
For more than 15 years, the mud alleys of the slum were ruled by a local thug named Akku Yadav. A higher-caste man, he killed, raped and robbed in this community of Dalits — those at the bottom of the caste ladder — and the police paid no attention. One woman, according to people here, went to the police station to report that she had been gang-raped by Akku Yadav and his goons, and the police raped her.
Neighbors tell how Akku Yadav forced a man to dance naked in front of his teenage daughter. They say that he chopped one woman into pieces in front of her daughter, and that another woman burned herself to death after he and his men gang-raped her.
There was only one family that Akku Yadav’s gang didn’t torment — that of Madhukar and Alka Narayane — because from this squalor they sent all five of their children through college. In a neighborhood where many are illiterate and no one had ever gone to college, that was a heroic achievement, and it made gangsters wary about preying on them.
A daughter, Usha Narayane, now 27, studied hotel management and seemed destined to become a hotel manager. But one day in 2004 while she was on vacation back in the slum, Akku Yadav attacked the next-door neighbors. The gang warned Usha not to go to the police — and that’s when she went to the police.
Akku Yadav returned with 40 men and surrounded the Narayane shack. He waved a bottle of acid and threatened to disfigure Usha’s face, and to rape and kill her. She barricaded the door, shouted insults at him and telephoned the police, who didn’t immediately come.
Finally, Usha turned on the gas, grabbed a match and threatened to blow up everyone if the gang broke into the house. The gangsters backed off. (For video of Usha in her slum, go to nytimes.com/kristof.)
The neighbors, seeing somebody finally stand up to Akku Yadav, gathered in the street. Soon a mob burned down Akku Yadav’s house, and he turned himself over to the police for protection.
A bail hearing for him was set for Aug. 13, 2004, and word spread through the slum that he would be released. Hundreds of women marched from the slum to the courthouse. When Akku Yadav showed up, he spotted a woman he had raped and shouted that he would rape her again. She began beating him with her slipper.
Other women pulled out chili powder from their clothes and threw it in the faces of Akku Yadav and the police. As the police fled, scores of women pulled out knives and apparently took turns stabbing Akku Yadav and cutting off his penis. He ended up as mincemeat, and the courtroom walls are still spattered with blood.
The police arrested a handful of women, including Usha, for the murder, but she conveniently could prove that she was not at the courtroom that day. And then the hundreds of women in the slum jointly declared that they had all joined in the killing, on the theory that if they all claimed responsibility, no single person could be punished.
”We all did it,” affirms Rajashri Rangdale, a young mother. ”We all take responsibility for what happened.”
”I’m proud of what we did,” agrees Jija More, a housewife. ”We were all involved.”
As for Usha, she is out on bail, but the police harass her and her career as a hotel manager seems over. She is sure that other members of Akku Yadav’s gang will try to seek revenge by raping and killing her. But, undaunted, she is beginning a new life as a social activist, and she is now helping the slum dwellers make foods and clothing that they can sell together to raise their incomes.
I don’t want to condone a lynching. But in a land where police are utterly corrupt, and where so much misery arises from people passively accepting their lot, I’m proud to know Usha Narayane. She is a reminder of the difference that education makes, and I hope that she is a vision of the new Indian woman.
This story is quite old. Almost 2 years now. For those who are interested in further extracts of that NYT article go to this thread by Uma. She also has a thorough line up of other links to this story. I don’t know why is there a flurry of reports suddenly. Is there any change in the status of the case? I would like to know if so. Am I missing something?
As I’ve said over at Uma’s post, this case is unique and whatever the outcome it’s going to be very interesting and one which will set a precedent. On one hand we have a murder (of a serial rapist, but murder nevertheless), in broad daylight right outside a courtroom in the presence of police. And on the other hand are these hundreds of Dalit women living under the shadow of oppression and humiliation for years. Going by conventional judicial wisdom, somebody gotta pay for the murder…but in this case it was not one but a mob of women which killed him, and who are readily submitting to it. On the other hand, given the facts, the court in its right mind cannot punish all these women. The best part is they are all sticking together, and now allowing any one of them to be taken as scapegoat. The police arresting these 5 women is just a sign of how Indian police/judicial system works, sidestepping the real issues all the time. The court (if it’s sane) has to do a tough balancing act, by getting these women freed, yet justify it fully within the legal framework. Then again, this could so easily turn out to be one more case in the pile of lacs of pending cases. After all Akku Yadav did get bail 12 times from the same court.
For those who are further interested, Kalpana Sharma, who writes about women’s issues, has written a very thought-provoking piece with her notes from a student’s debate organized in a Bombay college and here’s the Guardian report.
Thx Articlewallah.
Kush quotes Kristof: For more than 15 years, the mud alleys of the slum were ruled by a local thug named Akku Yadav. A higher-caste man, he killed, raped and robbed in this community of Dalits – those at the bottom of the caste ladder – and the police paid no attention.
Incidentally, Yadavs are recognized by the govt as OBCs. In other words, lower caste. Ironic, since Yadavs have been notorious for caste based killings in the north ever since they gained political power.
…and not allowing any one of them to be taken as a scapegoat…
Laloo Yadav has raped over 100 women like this and gotten away with it. I guess Akku Y. didn’t have Mrs. Sonia Gandhi’s support……
I agree, Kristof is the epitome of “bleeding heart liberal”, but I don’t necessarily see that as a bad thing, Siddhartha. The stories he raises are unknowns in the majority of Western media outlets (who have abdicated from their responsibility in this regard IMO). By raising awareness, he creates attention, and subsequently often, donations. It isn’t just indignation, it’s more.
That being said, I definitely think the neo-colonialist angle you raise has merit. I do wish he was more careful with language, but I also think Kristof uses hyperbole to illustrate his vision. The Times has many columnists who raise America’s complicity in the moral and/or global challenges we face. Kristof’s niche is different.
isn’t Lord Krishna a Yadav? If so, isn’t that a Kshatriya class, since he was born in a royal family? Casteism sucks. The reservations are enough to drive any person up the wall. Rather than putting reservations, they should increase education at the grassroots levels so people are on par once they reach college. But that is another issue altogether. Have you seen Mrityudand? My mother had dreams of becoming prims Minister and showing this movie free to all rural women. The stagnation in India, if you’re a housewife watching soaps, or a woman who’s hoping she’ll mary well despite her education, somehow naturally makes complicity in the patriarchal mission inevitable. The idle mind is the devil’s workshop indeed. the idle penis… the devil’s tool. The whole concept of rape renders men more childish than if they were to murder other men. tsk.
::ItÂ’s got overtones of Mirch Masala, Krantiveer and Bandit Queen:
And here’s the original.
According to an old curse attributed to Krishna himself, his kind, the Yadavas are supposed to be on a self-destruct mode. They will fight each other to death.
I wonder how powerful the caste system was in Krishna’s days, if he was an historical figure…
Not exactly. Krishna’s adopted family were Yadavs. Krishna himself was born to royal Kshatriya parents, as you’ve correctly stated.
Assuming I remember those old TV episodes of Mahabharata correctly, apparently he was cursed as above by one of the female characters of the story for having the power to prevent the slaughter but not doing enough directly to stop it.
So Samurai Jack finally got his man…
I thought this happened long long ago. I read about this more than a few months ago.
since when did Yadavs become a high caste? freakin goras with their white mans burden theory wanna save the browns now….lol. what next?high caste harijans:)?
Cool Ladies. When 5 or women get together they are like powerful. Like Women Self Help groups in India.Women in a group can influence a lot. I like the spirit of women. this story proves it. I feel bad for them, becuase of what Men do, even Good men, Just with one moment of stupidity.I feel bad for People’s ignorance against Women. I seen strong Women, they shouldnot have been considered as weak, the Women who worked in farms to feed us, the women who silently have suffered pain,the Pain that women suffers when she gives birth to the child, the pain that Men give – they silently suffer. i have seen intelligent women who suffered just because they were Intelligent – either they wait for time to heal or women like usha narayane who take justice in their own hands -remember Rani kittur Chennama.
Please read readers digest July or august 2007 issue – a story of women who waited for about 20 years for her bf to die – who scared her to death – another story of Waman – and this happend in USA – a delusioned scizophrenic and a Intelligent and caring Woman.
yup its July issue of Readers digest – a different story but something related to women – Article is: Possesed by Love