Time Magazine Asia wonders if the saffronists are losing their influence in India and if the hope for peace is turning the people off to their message:

If India and Pakistan are to make peace, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh noted a few days ago, people have to want it. An attack by six suspected Muslim militants on a contested religious site at Ayodhya in northern India triggered protests last week, as Hindus marched in New Delhi shouting “Down, down Pakistan!” and forced roads and shops to close across the country. Police used water cannons to disperse demonstrators and arrested some 3,000 people. “I have always maintained that we need to carry public opinion to make a success of the peace process,” Singh warned as he appealed for calm. “Anything that comes in the way of public opinion—and certainly these incidents, if they get repeated—has the potential to disrupt the peace process.”

The potential, yes. But not, as used to be the case, the probability. Despite the attack and ensuing protests—far from the worst India has seen—the mood on both sides of the border finally seems to be moving beyond a half-century of confrontation. Today, Indians and Pakistanis meet as friends in business, on movie screens and on the cricket pitch. And in contrast to the murderous outrage that used to follow suspected Islamic attacks on Indian soil, there were no reports of reprisals against Muslims in India last week.

Many ascribe this relative amity to the fading appeal of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Hindu nationalist party that won general elections in 1997 and 1998.

As if on cue, The RSS has delivered its promised message to BJP president L.K. Advani. The Hindu reports:

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh on Monday delivered its promised stern message to the Bharatiya Janata Party leadership, especially the president L.K. Advani, that it would not tolerate any deviation from its ideology or any “ideological erosion”.

Party sources said the message was unambiguous: No deviation would be allowed from the Sangh ideology and Mr. Advani should go for having shaken the very foundations of those beliefs with his Jinnah formulation during his Pakistan visit. It was now for the BJP to act.

Despite pressure from the RSS till late in the night, Mr. Advani did not oblige it with his resignation.

Continue reading →

The “B” word continues its reign of terror. Across the pond, the tally thus far:

• One serious injury
• One gurudwara in Kent set on fire
• Three attacks on mosques in east London and Bristol
• Four arson attacks on mosques (Leeds, Belvedere, Telford and Birkenhead)
• 19 windows smashed at the mosque in east London
• Bottles thrown at the windows of a gurudwara in south London
• Arson in Southall, reported at the home of an Asian family

Then there was the poor Asian woman from Middlesex who, on the day of the bombings, recognized the unmistakable scent of petroleum while “liquid” dripped down her door. Remind me to add “attempted arson” to the bullet points above.

Commander Brian Paddick, a senior spokesperson for the police had this to say:

“We have had a number of incidents of hate crime, racially and religiously motivated offences, and we take these types of offences very, very seriously,” he told reporters.

So the good guys are on the case. But whose case are they on? When I first posted about vandalized mosques and gurudwaras, a fast and furious comment thread decayed in to race-baiting madness. The flames have been put out, but a remaining comment makes me shake my head.

We don’t actually know that the gurudwara attack was fomented by white people, do we? For all we know it could have been Hindus, but this board is full of remarks about British and American skinheads, etc., which simply assume the racial identity of the evil-doers.

Right. Except I don’t have to assume Jack when I repeatedly read facts like this:

The same day, five white men were arrested after bottles were thrown at the windows of a gurdwara in south London.

Maybe they were white Hindus. One can never be sure. Continue reading →

Suketu Mehta provides his take on the outsourcing debate in Tuesday’s New York Times:

The outsourcing debate seems to have mutated into a contest between the country of my birth and the country of my nationality. Of course I feel a loyalty to America: it gave my parents a new life and my sons were born here. I have a vested interest in seeing America prosper. But I am here because the country of my ancestors didn’t understand the changing world; it couldn’t change its technology and its philosophy and its notions of social mobility fast enough to fight off the European colonists, who won not so much with the might of advanced weaponry as with the clear logical philosophy of the Enlightenment. Their systems of thinking conquered our own. So, since independence, Indians have had to learn; we have had to slog for long hours in the classroom while the children of other countries went out to play.

When I moved to Queens, in New York City, at the age of 14, I found myself, for the first time in my life, considered good at math. In Bombay, math was my worst subject, and I regularly found my place near the bottom of the class rankings in that rigorous subject. But in my American school, so low were their standards that I was – to my parents’ disbelief – near the top of the class. It was the same in English and, unexpectedly, in American history, for my school in Bombay included a detailed study of the American Revolution. My American school curriculum had, of course, almost nothing on the subcontinent’s freedom struggle. I was mercilessly bullied during the 1979-80 hostage crisis, because my classmates couldn’t tell the difference between Iran and India. If I were now to move with my family to India, my children – who go to one of the best private schools in New York – would have to take remedial math and science courses to get into a good school in Bombay.

Outsourcing is sure to be an issue in the midterm elections next year, even more so than the last Presidential election. The Democrats shamelessly pander to their base while the Republicans avoid the issue like the plague. Nobody bothers to admit that fixing our education system is the best way to prevent the “problem” in the first place. Mehta describes that the “logical philosophy of the Enlightenment” that allowed Europeans to dominate in the first place is now being ignored by them. He beautifully points out that turnabout is only fair:

There is a perverse hypocrisy about the whole jobs debate, especially in Europe. The colonial powers invaded countries like India and China, pillaged them of their treasures and commodities and made sure their industries weren’t allowed to develop, so they would stay impoverished and unable to compete. Then the imperialists complained when the destitute people of the former colonies came to their shores to clean their toilets and dig their sewers; they complained when later generations came to earn high wages as doctors and engineers; and now they’re complaining when their jobs are being lost to children of the empire who are working harder than they are. My grandfather was once confronted by an elderly Englishman in a London park who asked, “Why are you here?” My grandfather responded, “We are the creditors.” We are here because you were there.

Continue reading →