India’s top court is urging that the government make male new hires who are married disclose whether they accepted dowry and threaten gaol time if they did:
… a candidate aspiring for a government job, and those already in service, would have to provide information about any dowry taken by them. Under the anti-dowry law, the custom is punishable by a jail term.
This is another example of governments influencing markets through their own purchasing power, e.g. 55 mph speed limits, education testing, minority set-asides, open source software and so on. The public University of California system even forced a rewrite of the venerable SAT test. To the poor kids struggling through the new essay section this spring, y’all can thank Berkeley and UCLA for that.
It’s not clear to me how the anti-dowry plan would be enforceable. Ideally, it would work better than mandatory drug testing, which created a cottage industry in fake urine samples. At its best, it could save future Nisha Sharmas from dowry plight by changing what’s socially acceptable and giving grooms a legitimate excuse to turn aside demands by their families.
I approve of government using market incentives in addition to blunt, sometimes ineffective legislation. Maybe they can issue tax credits for Bollywood Costume Design That’s Not Blindingly Tacky. Or the Padmashree for Novels Without Saris or Mehndi on the Cover.
Now that’s government to be proud of.
Continue reading →